Evaluation of the Prediction Performance of the Annual Consultation Meeting on Earthquake Tendency by Using the Gambling Score

Jian Zhuang
2012-01-01
Chinese Journal of Geophysics
Abstract:The Annual Consultation Meeting on Earthquake Tendency in China is held by the China Earthquake Administration(CEA) in order to provide comprehensive one-year earthquake predictions over most China since 1970s.In particular,this meeting gives a map of several alarmed regions which are marked as having high probabilities of large earthquakes(usually M≥6.0 in the western part and M≥5.0 in the eastern part of China).Because these earthquake predictions are made on arbitrary regions with flexible magnitude ranges,it is rather difficult to evaluate their performance objectively and to accumulate prediction experiences from effective predictions.In the present study,the gambling score is used to evaluate the performance of these earthquake predictions.Based on a reference model,this scoring method rewards successful predictions and penalizes failures according to the risk(probability of being failure) that the predictors have taken.Using the Poisson model,which is spatially inhomogeneous and temporally stationary,with the Gutenberg-Richter law for earthquake magnitudes as the reference model,we evaluate the CEA predictions.The performance of predictions made by the Annual Consultation Meetings on Earthquake Tendency from 1990 to 2003 are found significantly better than the reference Poisson model even though the performance varies greatly from year to year.The results show that these predictions include significant precursory information and that the determination of the alarmed regions with high gambling scores provides useful information and experiences for improving earthquake predictions.On the other hand,the CEA predictions are shown to include little knowledge of past seismic activity.A direct technique by which to improve their performance from the nonhomogeneous Poisson model is to incorporate information of the spatial distribution of seismicity rates in the CEA predictions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?