Corrigendum to ‘Anti-Restenosis Treatment with Drug-Eluting or Covered Stents in Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease: Evidence from a Comprehensive Network Meta-analysis’ [european Journal of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery 58/1 (2019) 61–74]

Rongzhou He,Yanchen Ye,Zilun Li,Yu Jiang,Yonghui Li,Yunyan Liu,Kangjie Wang,Chen Yao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.10.006
IF: 6.427
2020-01-01
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Abstract:The authors regret Missing mention the funding body of this work in the main text. This work was supported by a peripheral arterial disease research funds project from the local government agency “Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau” (Funds information: Science and Technology Plan of Guangzhou, 201508020116). Thanks for the help of editors and officers and we are sorry for any inconvenience caused by this oversight. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Restenosis Prevention With Drug Eluting or Covered Stents in Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease: Evidence From a Comprehensive Network Meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular SurgeryVol. 58Issue 1PreviewEndovascular interventions for femoropopliteal (FP) arterial diseases are limited by the development of restenosis. Current drug coated devices are capable of preventing restenosis by releasing antiproliferative agents to the vessel wall. However, default strategies for the treatment of FP diseases remain controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy differences between drug eluting stents (DES), covered stents (CS), and other commonly used endovascular treatments in FP lesions, including drug coated balloons (DCBs), bare metal stents (BMS), and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). Full-Text PDF Open Archive
What problem does this paper attempt to address?