Remarkable Progress in Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastric Cancer

Ichiro Oda,Takuji Gotoda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05975.x

2009-01-01

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Abstract:Endoscopic resection is accepted in many countries as a less invasive local resection of early gastric cancer with a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis.1,2 Endoscopic resection preserves the stomach and therefore improves patient quality of life compared with surgery. Remarkable progress has been made during the past decade because of technical improvements and an expansion of the indications for endoscopic resection. The methods vary from polypectomy to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).1,2 EMR procedures include inject and cut, strip biopsy, EMR with a cap-fitted endoscope (EMRC), endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy (EAM) and EMR with a ligating device (EMRL), whereas ESD is a relatively new endoscopic resection method that facilitates one-piece resection. In the past, the accepted indications for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer were a small intramucosal cancer less than 2 cm in size, having a differentiated histopathological type and without an ulcer finding.2 Recently, the indications for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer have been expanded, as shown in Table 1, to cover other lesions with a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis.2,3 These expanded indications include larger lesions and lesions with ulceration. Such lesions were previously resected by surgery because of the difficulty in effectively using EMR techniques. As a result, ESD was developed to achieve one-piece resections even for larger and ulcerative lesions.1,2 In volume 24 issue 6 of the Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hoteya et al. report on the advantages of ESD for treating early gastric cancer compared to EMR.4 The local complete resection (one-piece resection with a negative tumor margin) rate (EMR, 64%; ESD, 95%) and the curative resection rate (EMR, 60%; ESD, 83%) were significantly higher for ESD than for EMR in their study. In addition, 13 local recurrences (4.0%) were detected in the EMR group during follow up in comparison to no local recurrences in the ESD group. One-piece resection with a negative tumor margin is optimal for endoscopic resection because it substantially reduces the risk of local recurrence. One-piece resection with a positive tumor margin and piecemeal resection both have an increased risk of local recurrence, although the thermal effect from endoscopic resection may help to prevent this. Hoteya and his colleagues demonstrated in their article that the rate of one-piece resection with a negative tumor margin was higher regardless of location in ESD compared to EMR, thus reducing the overall risk of local recurrence. Their results were similar to previously published reports.5–8 One-piece resection is also optimal because endoscopic resection is a local resection procedure without lymph-node dissection. It is therefore indicated for early gastric cancer with a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis. The early gastric cancer criteria for a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis are shown in Table 1. Tumor depth is one of the most important factors, but endoscopic prediction of early gastric cancer in terms of tumor depth is not always accurate, even when endoscopic ultrasonography is used.9–11 The curability of endoscopic resection therefore must be determined histopathologically based on criteria for early gastric cancer with a negligible risk of lymph-node metastasis, as well as the resection margin (Table 1). Endoscopic resection is considered to be non-curative if a tumor is diagnosed as having either a possible risk of lymph-node metastasis or a positive lateral margin. In fact, lymph-node metastasis has been reported among 6.3% of patients who had surgery following non-curative endoscopic resection with a possible risk of lymph-node metastasis.12 Piecemeal resections can make it difficult to histopathologically evaluate curability, thus resulting in some findings that suggest a possible risk of lymph-node metastasis being overlooked. Without surgical treatment in such cases, there could be a risk of distant metastasis developing. It follows that histopathological staging using specimens obtained by one-piece resection is crucial with endoscopic resection so as to decide on the need for any subsequent treatment. Hoteya et al. also demonstrated that there were no significant differences in complication (postoperative bleeding and perforation) rates between EMR and ESD. Endoscopic resection techniques should be safe, but endoscopic resection has been associated with an increased risk of complications such as bleeding and perforation. Although there was no reported significant difference in the perforation rate between the EMR and ESD groups, several earlier articles indicated that the risk of perforation was higher for ESD than for EMR.2,5 It has also been reported previously that the risk of perforation is related to tumor location, size and an ulcer finding,13,14 as has the usefulness of endoscopic closure with endoclips for gastric perforations.14 Whereas the rate of postoperative bleeding was similar between EMR and ESD, intraoperative bleeding occurs infrequently with EMR, but is quite common with ESD.15 Management of intraoperative bleeding plays a critical role in achieving complete resection during ESD. Cautery is used for hemostasis during endoscopic resection because endoclips interfere with the subsequent resection. Minor oozing can be controlled by cautery using cutting devices such as the needle knife, IT knife, Hook knife or Flex knife. Cautery using hemostatic forceps is suitable for arterial bleeding.15 The number of early gastric cancer patients undergoing endoscopic resection is increasing in Japan because of the expanded indications and technical improvements mentioned above.Consequently, the actual number of complications associated with endoscopic resection has also increased. Thus, endoscopists must now be aware of both the risk factors and the rate of complications as well as how to effectively treat such complications. Early detection is essential for carrying out endoscopic resection. Japan has had a well-organized mass-screening program for gastric cancer as part of its public health services since the mid-1960s.16 This program has, however, most often used gastrophotofluorography which has comparatively poor resolution so that sensitivity for early-stage cancer was low (39%), albeit sensitivity for advanced cancer was high (92%).17 Recently, the development of video endoscopy has had a substantial impact on improving early diagnosis, and early gastric cancer now accounts for nearly 50% of all gastric cancers treated at major medical facilities in Japan.18,19 In fact, most cases (78%) of early gastric cancer at our hospital between 2001 and 2003 were detected by endoscopy.20 The use of endoscopy for mass screening nationwide would be impractical and difficult, because of its low cost-effectiveness and the lack of a sufficient number of endoscopists. An alternative mass-screening approach has been proposed using endoscopy after the identification of high-risk subjects.21 An initial screening test would be carried out using combination assays of serum Helicobacter pylori antibody and pepsinogen, followed by endoscopic examination of those individuals determined to be high-risk subjects. Such a strategy might also prove useful for the detection of early gastric cancer in other countries where the ratio of early gastric cancer to all gastric cancer cases is still low. Finally, Hoteya and his colleagues also reported that the rate of one-piece resection with a negative tumor margin did not differ significantly between EMR and ESD for lesions ≤ 5 mm in diameter. Such lesions can therefore be treated by either EMR or ESD. The precise method of resection is less important because the primary aim of endoscopic resection as a local resection procedure is to achieve one-piece resection with a negative tumor margin. In other words, alternative resection methods that may be developed in the future, such as a full-thickness resection procedure, could eventually replace ESD for the local resection of early gastric cancer.