Abstract:Procurement and outsourcing are two important topics for many firms.An increased number of companies outsource some of their internal functions to the third party in order to focus on their core competencies and improve their competitive advantage in the market.The popularity of outsourcing is growing,as both successes and failures have been observed in practice.It remains unclear about how the outsourcing decision influences each party's behavior and strategic decisions under different procurement mechanisms. In this paper we model a supply chain system in which a manufacturer purchases multiple components.For each component,there are multiple suppliers capable of providing it.The manufacturer considers outsourcing the procurement of all components to one of his suppliers,rather than purchasing them by himself.Since the production costs are not publicly known,auctions are used to reward the contract.In the first stage,the manufacturer uses the first-price sealed-bid reverse auction to determine which supplier wins the outsourcing contract.Then,the winner of the first auction produces the component that the company is able to provide,and uses reverse auctions to procure the required components from the subset of the suppliers in the first auction. We analyze a supplier's bidding strategies in both stages.In the second period the supplier's bidding strategy is independent of the publicly announced winning price in the first stage.The boundary conditions and differential equations are used to help formulate the supplier's bidding strategies in the first period.The supplier's first-period bidding price for the whole package can be decomposed into expected costs associated with all components.We also compare a manufacturer's total procurement cost when a manufacturer purchases components by itself versus when integral procurement is auctioned.The result shows that the total expected procurement costs are identical under both mechanisms.Furthermore,an explicit solution of bidding strategies for all suppliers can be derived for a special case,where the supplier's cost distributions are uniform.We also provide a numerical example to illustrate the supplier's bidding behavior. These results provide managerial insights for the managers.We show that although outsourcing integral procurement increases the complexity of the bidding strategy for the suppliers,it does not increase the manufacturer's total expected procurement cost.However,the outsourcing strategy can help the manufacturer focus on its core competency.

Why Do Firms Engage in Multi-Sourcing?

Why do firms conduct bi-sourcing?

Bi-sourcing in the global economy

Dual sourcing under suppliers' capacity investments

Home or Overseas? An Analysis of Sourcing Strategies under Competition

Stratified Outsourcing Theory

Performance Implications of the Fit Between Sourcing Configurations and Design-Manufacturing-service Capabilities

Strategic Sourcing under Competition and Asymmetric Cost Information

A multinational firm's global manufacturing location and outsourcing strategies

Sourcing strategies of manufacturers with customer returns and product design efforts

Outsourcing Strategy for Manufacturers Based on Computational Experiment

Sourcing Competition under Cost Uncertainty and Information Asymmetry

Product Cycle, Contractibility, and Global Sourcing

Strategic sourcing: benefits, problems and a contextual model

Supply Diversification with Responsive Pricing

Who's Doing the Work? What C-Suites Should Know About Sourcing

Mitigating risky sourcing with a responsible supplier in a competitive environment: the implication of product line design and sourcing diversification

Sourcing for Quality: Cooperating with a Single Supplier or Developing Two Competing Suppliers?

A Two-stage Equilibrium Bidding Strategy in Outsourcing Procurement of Multiple Components

Sourcing Strategies in Supply Risk Management: an Approximate Dynamic Programming Approach

Strategic Outsourcing Practices of Multi‐national Corporations (mncs) in China