Systems Thinking in Construction: Improving the Productivity and Performance of Infrastructure Projects

Peter Love,Luo Han-bin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/j-fem-2018205

2018-01-01

Abstract:“Systems thinking is a discipline for seeing wholes. It is a framework for seeing interrelationships rather than things, for seeing patterns of change, rather than static snapshots” (Peter Senge). Investment in infrastructure is required to meet the growing needs of an increasing population, as well as to sustain a competitive advantage in the global marketplace. For an economy to position itself to capitalize on growth and increased investment due to a burgeoning population and increasing international demand for goods and services, greater investment in infrastructure is needed. Yet history explicitly indicates the capital expenditure (CAPEX) of infrastructure projects routinely overrun their initial cost estimates leaving asset owners, financiers, contractors and the public dissatisfied; the productivity and profitability of organizations are also adversely impacted. This is not an unusual situation for infrastructure projects, as it has been observed that on average, 48% of them fail to meet their baseline time, cost and quality objectives. Well-known infrastructure projects that have attracted the attention of the popular press due to cost overruns being incurred include Boston’s Big Dig, the Denver International Airport, and the Øresund Bridge linking Denmark to Sweden. If the CAPEX of a project overruns, then the scope of works in others being considered or undertaken by Government’s may be reduced to accommodate the increased expenditure. Moreover, contractors could face cash flow issues, liquidity and damage to their business image while the public has to pay more when the taxpayer funds projects. This may also have a knock-on effect on the funds available for maintaining and operating the asset. For Governments, managing the cost performance of their portfolio of infrastructure projects is essential for ensuring the economic competitiveness and wealth for its constituents; it is a critical metric, as it quantifies the cost efficiency of the work completed. Cost performance is generally defined as the value of the work completed compared to the actual cost or progress made on the project. Thus, the ability to reliably estimate the final cost of construction is vital for maintaining the planning and resourcing in other projects or those in the pipeline. An issue that has been overlooked is the cost overrun that often materializes during the operation and maintenance of the asset that is constructed. Often infrastructure projects are delivered using Public Private Partnerships or variants thereof, though during operations and maintenance the private sector will generally be responsible for managing the asset. Despite the considerable amount of research that has been undertaken, the performance of infrastructure projects remains a problem for Governments worldwide. While studies have provided the essential building blocks to understand and provide a much-needed stimulus for theory that can be used to explain the poor performance of infrastructure projects, they are still prone to cost and schedule overruns and subjected to poor productivity. Understanding infrastructure projects by examining their linkages and interactions between their components can provide the impetus for developing strategies to improve their performance. In making headway to better understand how we can improve the performance and productivity of infrastructure projects at International Workshop entitled “Systems Thinking in Construction” was organized by Huazhong University of Science and Technology in collaboration with the Frontiers of Engineering Management (FEM) from 5th–7th in December 2017 in Wuhan, China. Key challenges, new ideas, technologies and methods to address the issues confronting our ability to design, manage, construct, operate and maintain infrastructure assets were presented and discussed with particular emphasis being placed on ‘systems thinking.’