Abstract:As many as 40% of all plant protection products currently used contain chiral active ingredients. Enantiomers of the same pesticide have identical physicochemical properties in an isotropic medium, but they may display different activity and toxicity because of their interaction with enzymes or other naturally occurring asymmetric molecules. This difference may also lead to variations in biotic degradation rates, making one enantiomer more persistent than the other in natural and agricultural environments. In terms of methodological aspects, this critical review describes the most used chiral stationary phases for HPLC enantioseparations of chiral pesticides, pinpointing their strengths and weaknesses. As far as their applicability is concerned, most research has been carried out by means of columns based on derivatized amylose/cellulose due to their rather universal analyte coverage. The chromatographic compatibility with sensitive detection techniques, such as mass spectrometry, has allowed the trace analysis of stereoisomers, revealing ubiquitous occurrence of some chiral pesticides in surface waters, sediments, plants, agricultural soils, roots, fruit and vegetables. The study of their distribution and degradation in various environmental compartments and agricultural soil-plant systems has highlighted the enrichment with one enantiomer over the other in certain matrices following the enantioselective dissipation catalysed by microorganisms or plant enzymes as well as the phenomenon of chiral inversion in some cases. Irrespective of the reliability of a chiral method, such investigations are often hindered by the lack of pure standards of single enantiomers, which makes it difficult to identify their stereochemical configuration and requires precise strategies of quantification. Surely, the research in this field has been grown over the last few years due to the necessity of assessing and limiting risks related to exposure to chiral pesticides, which can be considered emerging contaminants in all aspects.

Enantioselective Phytoeffects of Chiral Pesticides.

Chiral pharmaceuticals: A review on their environmental occurrence and fate processes

Enantioselective environmental toxicology of chiral pesticides.

Chiral Pesticides and Environmental Safety

Phytotoxicity And Environmental Fate Of Chiral Herbicides

Enantioselectivity in environmental safety of current chiral insecticides.

Enantioselective Cytotoxicity and Molecular Mechanisms of Modern Chiral Pesticides

Enantioselectivity in Degradation and Ecological Risk of the Chiral Pesticide Ethiprole

Enantioselective Toxicity of Chiral Pesticides in Aquatic Systems

Enantioselectivity on Toxic Mechanisms of Chiral Pesticides

Enantioselectivity in Environmental Risk Assessment of Modern Chiral Pesticides.

Research progress on the stereoselective bioactivity and toxicity of chiral pesticides

Separation and aquatic toxicity of enantiomers of 1-(substituted phenoxyacetoxy)alkylphosphonate herbicides.

Enantioselectivity in Biotransformation and Bioaccumulation Processes of Typical Chiral Contaminants

A review on the enantioselective distribution and toxicity of chiral pesticides in aquatic environment

Research progress in Environmental fate of chiral pesticides

Chiral Selectivity in the Environmental Fate of Pyrethroids

Progress of Research on Chiral Herbicides

Progress in Potential Toxicity of Chiral Pesticides

Enantioselective high-performance liquid chromatographic separations to study occurrence and fate of chiral pesticides in soil, water, and agricultural products.

Risk Assessment of the Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Nine Chiral Pesticides.