Functional Changes of Baroreceptor Afferent, Central and Vagal Efferent Components in the Baroreflex Arc: Effects of SOD1 Overexpression in Mice

Jin Chen,Jeff T. Hatcher,Gu He,Zixi Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.30.1_supplement.753.7
2016-01-01
Abstract:Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as the superoxide radical (O2‐.), is associated with diseases which compromise cardiac autonomic function. Overexpression of SOD1 may offer protection against ROS damage to the cardiac autonomic system, but reductions of O2‐. may interfere with normal cellular functions. Therefore, we need to consider whether or not SOD1 overexpression in animals can affect the neural components of the baroreflex loop in normal animals. We have selected the C57B6SJL‐Tg (SOD1)2 Gur/J mouse as a model to determine whether SOD1 overexpression alters baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), aortic depressor nerve (ADN) function, and heart rate (HR) responses to ADN and vagal nerve stimulation. Under isoflurane anesthesia, left femoral artery and vein of mice were catheterized and MAP and HR were measured. Baroreflex control of HR (baroreflex sensitivity: BRS) and aortic depressor nerve functions were assessed in response to hypotension and hypertension which were induced by sequential injections of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine. In addition, HR responses to electrical stimulation of aortic depressor nerves and vagal efferent nerves were measured. Our data indicated that SOD1 overexpression: 1) increased aortic depressor nerve function, 2) decreased HR responses to vagal efferent nerve stimulations, 3) did not alter HR responses to aortic baroreceptor afferent nerve stimulation, 4) did not change baroreflex control of HR. Collectively, our findings suggest that SOD1 overexpression preserved the normal BRS, but may alter the function of baroreceptor afferent, central, and vagal efferent components differently. While SOD1 overexpression enhanced aortic depressor nerve function and central component function, a decreased vagal efferent control over HR may explain an unchanged BRS in C57B6SJL‐Tg (SOD1)2 Gur/J mice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?