Analysis of a Chinese Pedigree with Trichorhinophalangeal Syndrome Derived from a Missense Mutation in the TRPS1 Gene

D. Ye,Y. Fei,Yufeng Sheng,Jianjun Qiao,Fengqin Dong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.13082
2017-01-01
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology
Abstract:lizumab. We congratulate them on this very interesting paper, both in the cases and the review, but the report also raised some questions that we would like to address. First, the authors state that to their knowledge, there are only eight published case reports of idiopathic angiooedema treated with omalizumab in the literature to date. However, and obviously because of the delay between the acceptance and the publication of their paper, they did not mention our recent report on another eight patients with isolated angio-oedema refractory to other treatments, for which only omalizumab was successful. Second, we would like to draw attention to the high doses used by Pedraz Mu~ noz et al., as all the patients in our study responded without delay at monthly doses of 300 mg, and maintenance could be carried out at doses as low as 75 mg, with a wide time range, from 3 to 16 weeks. Likewise, in the previously conducted randomized studies on chronic urticaria and angiooedema, monthly doses of 300 mg were sufficient to control angio-oedema (and in some cases superior to placebo or other lower doses). Finally, a major analytical finding by Pedraz Mu~ noz et al. was the level of total IgE, which ranged between 150 and 875 kU/L in their patients. This might suggest an atopic condition and/or a causal allergy, which was not further investigated by the authors. In our opinion, an accurate allergological study could help exclude other underlying conditions, such as allergenic agents (foods, drugs other than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, latex, Anisakis simplex), or nonallergenic agents (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids, infections) able to cause recurrent angio-oedema in our environment. Perhaps the subsequent elimination of avoidable triggers might make unnecessary the continuous (and expensive) use of omalizumab in these patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?