The ‘crooked Timber’ of Humanitarianism

Michael A. Peters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1575173

2019-01-01

Educational Philosophy and Theory

Abstract:Paraphrasing Jean Baudrillard and extending his line of argument, we might entertain the proposition that contemporary humanitarianism is the tattered remnants of a philosophy of humanism that first came to fruition in the Renaissance. In literature, sculpture, painting, language, style, pedagogy and philosophy the Renaissance achieved an early form of human universalism by returning to the classical ideals of ancient Greek culture. The rediscovery of Plato and Platonism through the eyes of Eastern travellers and translation into the Italian vernacular fostered the new classicalism. Francesco Petrarca and other humanists including, Salutati, Bruni and Bracciolini, had rejected Scholastic Aristotelianism as sterile to return to the Platonic tradition. This is the philosophical basis for the first stirrings of ‘humanitarianism’ based on feelings towards one’s fellow human beings and an ethical view that they should be treated fairly. In the fourteenth century, this conception was inspired by a humanist education that embraced a wider conception of logic than Aristotelian syllogisms, that came to inform public forms of argumentation and debate. Mirandola’s (1486) Oration on the Dignity of Man, often referred to as ‘The Manifesto of the Renaissance,’ heralded the capacity of human achievement and the human quest for knowledge governed by the principle: ‘Man is the greatest wonder because he can choose to transform himself.’ The curriculum started with moral philosophy that, through magic and the Kabbalah, gave way to the mystical unification with God. It focused on the relation of the human to the divine (hence ‘humanists’) and viewed human beings as both the summit and purpose of God’s creation. Humanism was thus first a religious movement, rather a secular one which flowered during the Enlightenment. It was concerned with the place of humanity in the great ‘chain of being’ and, in consequence, what choices human beings could make. The mix of classical philosophy and medieval Christianity saw the soul as a vehicle of human equality under God. Suffering and the relief of suffering was regarded as part of a universal condition. Importantly, the relief of human suffering was construed as a moral duty and was considered that which stood in the way of happiness as an ultimate goal. Taking a cue from Baudrillard, we might argue that humanism represents a robust system of values and the unfolding history of humanitarianism based on successive definitions of what it is to be human in a universal sense (without exception) led to European universalism with a humanitarian face. We can find the origins of the contemporary concepts that shape humanitarian ideology, especially the doctrine of human rights, in attempts based on this universalism as a philosophy of intervention to relieve suffering. The human rights perspective rhetorically developed as a response to human suffering makes a direct call for help to focus on preventing serious harm rather than exalted or ecstatic well-being. Andorno and Baffone (2014) succinctly express the historical condensation of humanism in the twentieth century to the human rights movement: