Long-term Survival Comparison of Adjuvant FLOT Versus XELOX Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer in a Large Real-World Cohort.

Zuoyi Jiao,Shiying Gan,Bo Long,Huinian Zhou,Zyuaun Yu,Jie Mao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4080
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4080 Background: Recent Attraction-5 study has shown that logically advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients can't benefit from postoperative immunochemotherapy. The preferred adjuvant regimen for LAGC remains two-drug based chemotherapy as XELOX protocol, though three-drug based adjuvant FLOT regimen has not been well studied yet. This studyaimsto explore 10-year survival advantages of adjuvant FLOT versus XELOX regimen for LAGC. Methods: We retrospectively collected and analyzed data from 248 LAGC patients mainly composed of pathological T (pT) 3-4 stage, who received at least 4 cycles of FLOT or XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy at Lanzhou University Second Hospital from 2013 to 2018. To eliminate interference of confounding factors, we conducted a propensity score matching (PSM). The median follow-up time for all patients was 90.90 months. Results: After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) was 44.80 months in FLOT group and 34.87 months in XELOX group, with 5-year OS rate of 41.4% versus 25.3% and 10-year OS rate of 31.9% versus 11.8%. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with ECOG performance status 0 or pT3-4 stage attained significant survival benefits from adjuvant FLOT regimen. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 57.9% patients of FLOT group and 33.6% patients of XELOX group, while most of them were manageable. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that adjuvant FLOT regimen exhibits significantly long-term survival advantages for LAGC patients with good performance status and late disease stage compared with XELOX regimen, facilitating adjuvant FLOT regimen as a prospectively alternative option for LAGC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?