Utilization of Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA in Detecting Minimal Residual Disease and Guiding Adjuvant Therapy in Liver Cancer.

De-Zhen Guo,Shi-Yu Zhang,Zhu-Jun Gu,Shuang-Tao Zhou,Da-Wei Jin,Shuang Yang,Jia Fan,Jian Zhou,Xin-Rong Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.4125
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:4125 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a prevalent malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, often exhibits a grim prognosis due to recurrence post-surgical treatment. Minimal residual disease (MRD) is deemed a crucial factor contributing to early relapse following radical surgery. Previous studies have indicated that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may serve as a promising biomarker for evaluating MRD in various cancers. However, its applicability in liver cancer remains unclear. Methods: We prospective included 136 patients during 2019 to 2021 who underwent curative-intention surgery for HCC in Zhongshan hospital. Plasma samples (n=625) were collected prior to surgery, 1-month post-surgery, and during subsequent surveillance. Patient-specific somatic mutations were identified through whole-exome sequencing of tumor tissue. For each patient, 16 patient-specific somatic mutations were selected and employed to assess ctDNA through ultra-deep sequencing of plasma DNA. Results: The median follow-up period was 24 months. At the last follow-up, 45 (33.1%) patients relapsed. The preoperative ctDNA concentration was elevated in patients who experienced tumor relapse after surgical treatment compared to those didn’t relapse (median: 125 vs.8.4 mean tumor molecules/mL, P<0.001). Most of patients (80.9%) demonstrated a significant decrease in ctDNA concentration to negative levels after curative surgery. Those maintaining a positive postoperative ctDNA status faced a higher recurrence risk (HR=11.5, P<0.001). Throughout longitudinal follow-up, positive longitudinal ctDNA (positive in any point) was significantly associated with a higher recurrence risk (HR=69.3, P<0.001). The area under the curve of longitudinal ctDNA for predicting recurrence was 0.956, boasting a sensitivity of 93.3% and specificity of 97.8%. The median interval from the first positive longitudinal ctDNA to clinical recurrence confirmed by imaging test was 4 months. The predictive performance of longitudinal ctDNA for recurrence surpassed that of alpha-fetoprotein (0.956 vs. 0.680, P<0.001). Patients with positive longitudinal ctDNA experienced benefits from adjuvant therapy (HR=0.4, P=0.019). Moreover, a decrease or stability of ctDNA after adjuvant therapy indicated treatment response and delayed clinical relapse (HR=0.3, P=0.00012). Conclusions: Tumor-informed ctDNA proves to be a reliable indicator for MRD detection after surgical treatment for HCC, enabling the prediction and anticipation of recurrence before clinical manifestation. It plays a crucial role in guiding the application of adjuvant therapy and assessing treatment efficacy, thereby facilitating postoperative management and enhancing the precision of medical interventions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?