Abstract:Online learning in a decentralized two-sided matching markets, where the demand-side (players) compete to match with the supply-side (arms), has received substantial interest because it abstracts out the complex interactions in matching platforms (e.g. UpWork, TaskRabbit). However, past works assume that each arm knows their preference ranking over the players (one-sided learning), and each player aim to learn the preference over arms through successive interactions. Moreover, several (impractical) assumptions on the problem are usually made for theoretical tractability such as broadcast player-arm match Liu et al. (2020; 2021); Kong & Li (2023) or serial dictatorship Sankararaman et al. (2021); Basu et al. (2021); Ghosh et al. (2022). In this paper, we study a decentralized two-sided matching market, where we do not assume that the preference ranking over players are known to the arms apriori. Furthermore, we do not have any structural assumptions on the problem. We propose a multi-phase explore-then-commit type algorithm namely epoch-based CA-ETC (collision avoidance explore then commit) (\texttt{CA-ETC} in short) for this problem that does not require any communication across agents (players and arms) and hence decentralized. We show that for the initial epoch length of $T_{\circ}$ and subsequent epoch-lengths of $2^{l/\gamma} T_{\circ}$ (for the $l-$th epoch with $\gamma \in (0,1)$ as an input parameter to the algorithm), \texttt{CA-ETC} yields a player optimal expected regret of $\mathcal{O}\left(T_{\circ} (\frac{K \log T}{T_{\circ} \Delta^2})^{1/\gamma} + T_{\circ} (\frac{T}{T_{\circ}})^\gamma\right)$ for the $i$-th player, where $T$ is the learning horizon, $K$ is the number of arms and $\Delta$ is an appropriately defined problem gap. Furthermore, we propose a blackboard communication based baseline achieving logarithmic regret in $T$.

Optimal Analysis for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets with Serial Dictatorship

Player-optimal Stable Regret for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets

Improved Bandits in Many-to-one Matching Markets with Incentive Compatibility

Competing Bandits in Non-Stationary Matching Markets

Decentralized Competing Bandits in Many-to-One Matching Markets.

Bandit Learning in Many-to-One Matching Markets

Bandit Learning in Decentralized Matching Markets

Dynamic Matching Bandit For Two-Sided Online Markets

On the Analysis of Two-Stage Stochastic Bandit

Bandit Learning in Matching Markets: Utilitarian and Rawlsian Perspectives

An Asymptotically Optimal Batched Algorithm for the Dueling Bandit Problem

Explore-then-Commit Algorithms for Decentralized Two-Sided Matching Markets

Non-Stationary Dueling Bandits Under a Weighted Borda Criterion

Thompson Sampling for Bandit Learning in Matching Markets

Batched Dueling Bandits

Dueling Bandits With Weak Regret

Competing Bandits in Decentralized Large Contextual Matching Markets

Copeland Dueling Bandit Problem: Regret Lower Bound, Optimal Algorithm, and Computationally Efficient Algorithm

Dueling Bandits: From Two-dueling to Multi-dueling

Combinatorial Bandits under Strategic Manipulations

Simple Combinatorial Algorithms for Combinatorial Bandits - Corruptions and Approximations.