ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Complicated by Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest May Not Benefit from Emergency Percutaneous Intervention

Kun Wang,Yu Shen,Pei-wen Li,Rong Gu,Jingmei Zhang,Lian Wang,J. Bai,Biao Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.226887
IF: 6.133
2018-01-01
Chinese Medical Journal
Abstract:To the Editor: Out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of cardiac origin is one of the leading causes of death in the industrialized world. The American Heart Association recommended patients who have been successfully resuscitated from OHCA and whose initial electrocardiogram (ECG) showing ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should undergo emergent cardiac catheterization with the intent to identify and revascularize the culprit lesion by percutaneous intervention (PCI) when clinically applicable. However, few recent retrospective studies and prospective registries observed a beneficial effect of emergency coronary angiography and PCI on the outcome of resuscitated patients with OHCA. Emergency PCI seemed to improve in‐hospital outcome of resuscitated but unconscious patients with OHCA in developed countries.[1] However, data on how many patients with OHCA were able to receive emergency PCI are still lacking. Conversely, whether emergency PCI improves survival rate in patients who remain unconscious after OHCA in developing country is still debatable. This study retrospectively analyzed STEMI patients who suffered from OHCA in our department, and we hoped to provide some experience for future reference.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?