Diagnostic Values, Association with Disease Activity and Possible Risk Factors of Anti-Pad4 in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Meta-Analysis.

Guangyue Zhang,Jiayi Xu,Dongru Du,Yi Liu,Lunzhi Dai,Yi Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kead545
2023-01-01
Rheumatology
Abstract:OBJECTIVEAnti-peptidyl arginine deaminase 4 (anti-PAD4) antibody has been a subject of investigation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the last two decades. This meta-analysis investigated the diagnostic values, association with disease activity, and possible risk factors of anti-PAD4 antibody in rheumatoid arthritis.METHODWe searched studies from five databases up to December 1st, 2022. Bivariate mixed-effect models were used to pool the diagnostic accuracy indexes, and the summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC) curve was plotted. The quality of diagnostic studies was assessed using QUADAS-2. Non-diagnostic meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effects model. Sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, subgroup analyses and Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test were used to address heterogeneity.RESULTFinally, 24 journal articles and one letter were included. Anti-PAD4 antibody had a good diagnostic value between RA and healthy individuals, but it might be lower between RA and other rheumatic diseases. Moreover, anti-PAD4 could slightly enhanced RA diagnostic sensitivity with combination of anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) or ACPA/Rheumatoid factor (RF). Anti-PAD4 antibody was positively correlated with HLA-SE and negatively correlated with ever or current smoking in patients with RA. RA patients with anti-PAD4 antibody had higher DAS28, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), swollen joint count (SJC) and possibility of having interstitial lung disease and pulmonary fibrosis compared with those without.CONCLUSIONOur study suggests that anti-PAD4 antibody is a potentially useful diagnostic biomarker and clinical indicator for RA. Further mechanistic studies are required to understand the impact of HLA-SE and smoking on the production of anti-PAD4 antibody.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?