Multi Kernel Cross Sparse Graph Attention Convolutional Neural Network for Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Super-Resolution

Xin Hua,Zhijiang Du,Jixin Ma,Hongjian Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106444
IF: 5.1
2024-01-01
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
Abstract:High-resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is pivotal in both diagnosing and treating brain tumors, assisting physicians in diagnosis and treatment by displaying anatomical structures. Utilizing convolutional neural network-based super-resolution methods enables the efficient acquisition of high-resolution MRI images. However, Convolutional neural networks are limited by their kernel size, which restricts their ability to capture a wider field of view, potentially leading to feature omission and difficulties in establishing global and local feature relationships. To overcome these shortcomings, We have designed a novel network architecture that highlights three main modules: (i) Multiple Convolutional Feature (MCF)extraction module, which diversifies convolution operations for extracting image features, achieving comprehensive feature representation. (ii) Multiple Groupss of Cross-Iterative Feature(MGCIF) modules, promoting inter-channel feature interactions and emphasizing crucial features needed for subsequent learning. (iii) A Graph Neural Network Module based on a sparse attention mechanism, capable of connecting distant pixel features and identifying influential neighboring pixels for target pixel inpainting. To evaluate the accuracy of our proposed network, we conducted tests on four datasets, comprising two sets of brain tumor data and two sets of healthy head MRI data, all of which underwent varying degrees of degradation. We conducted experiments using nineteen super-resolution (SR) models. Our experiments were carried out on four datasets, and the results demonstrate that our method outperforms the current leading-edge methods. In the four datasets, our model showed improvements in Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) scores compared to the second-place model,with increase of 1.16 %,1.08 %,0.19 % and 0.53 % for x2,and 2.26 %,1.67 %,0.13 % and 0.45 % for x 4,respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?