Teleonomy, legibility, and diversity: Do we need more "proxynomics"?

Oliver Braganza,Yohan J. John,Leigh Caldwell,Dakota E. McCoy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x24000050
2024-05-15
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Abstract:When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. (Strathern, 1997) Our target article set out with an ambitious goal: To provide a unified account of the disparate descriptions of proxy failure across not only social and natural sciences but also engineering and artificial intelligence research. Clearly such a task could only truly be achieved by a broad transdisciplinary community. The wide range of commentaries from a remarkable array of disciplines has not only confirmed our main proposition – that the disparate cases do reflect the same core phenomenon of "proxy failure" – but suggests the viability of a new interdisciplinary undertaking that we might call "proxynomics." Several comments highlighted key issues and extensions, others provided novel illuminating examples and, perhaps most importantly, quite a few proposed viable solutions or at least mitigation strategies.
behavioral sciences,neurosciences,psychology, biological
What problem does this paper attempt to address?