1463-P: Genetic Heterogeneity and Clinical Subtypes of Type 1 Diabetes

YU SHI,TONG YUE,HUILING TAN,YU DING,LANXIN PAN,CHUANG GUO,SIHUI LUO,XUEYING ZHENG,JIANPING WENG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2337/db24-1463-p
IF: 7.7
2024-01-01
Diabetes
Abstract:Introduction & Objective: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a heterogeneous disorder; however, the extent to which genetic and clinical factors distinguish T1D patient’s subgroups remains uncertain. We aimed to incorporate HLA alleles and their interactions and then develop a novel T1D Genetic Risk Score (GRS). Also, we utilized a phenome-wide association study (PheWAS) to refine T1D subtype classification. Methods: Among 1,352 Chinese T1D cases and 1,602 healthy controls, we used logistic regression to identify HLA class I and II alleles associated with T1D risk and combined significant loci to create the GRS. We modeled interactions between alleles marking strongly associated HLA haplotypes. Then, we employed PheWAS to assess the associations between 43 phenotypes and risk genotypes. Results: T1D patients had reduced polymorphisms in HLA alleles and attenuated linkage disequilibrium between alleles compared to controls. The HLA-DRB1*09:01-HLA-DQA1*03:02 loci were significantly associated with the risk of T1D. Additionally, HLA-B*58:01 and HLA-C*3:02 exhibited associations with T1D and linkage with the DR3 haplotype. We observed a stronger genetic risk associated with an earlier onset age, especially in childhood-onset patients (p<0.001) based on the PheWAS and GRS. A significant association was found between lower ALT (p<0.01) and higher GAD antibody titers (p<0.001) and increased genetic risk in adult-onset patients. Conclusion: Our study characterized the HLA type and the association of genetic risk in Chinese T1D patients with different ages of onset and autoantibody titers. We translated the T1D genetic and clinical subtypes to further our understanding of the etiology of these subtypes. Y. Shi: None. T. Yue: None. H. Tan: None. Y. Ding: None. L. Pan: None. C. Guo: None. S. Luo: None. X. Zheng: None. J. Weng: None.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?