Meta-analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Ting Gao,Peiwen Zhao,Juanzhi Li,Yingjie Li,Xinxin Li,Xiaopeng He
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e20101
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:e20101 Background: Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy(CT) has become the standard treatment for SCLC. For patients who are not eligible for immune checkpoint inhibitors, CT alone has limited efficacy. Anlotinib (AL3818), an oral, small-molecular TKI, has displayed significant anti-angiogenesis and anti-tumor growth effects through the inactivation of the VEGFR, PDGFR, FGFR and c-Kit. Several study indicated that anlotinib could prolong PFS in patients with SCLC. A meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with CT for patients with SCLC is needed. SCLC is urgently demanding novel and effective strategies. Herein, this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anlotinib plus CT for SCLC. This investigation of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with CT may provide a reference for the treatment selection and management of SCLC. Methods: The studies were searched through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science up to July 28, 2023, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP databases up to July 4, 2023. The outcomes include ORR, DCR, mPFS, OS, VEGF, and AE. Subgroup analysis was performed regarding chemotherapy drug types and the number of previous treatment cycles. Results: A total of 16 studies with 1083 patients were included in the study. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy showed significantly better efficacy in improving ORR, DCR, and mPFS compared with anlotinib therapy alone or CT alone and better PFS, 1-year and 2-year OS, and lower VEGF compared with chemotherapy alone (all P <0.05). The combination of anlotinib with CT had a significantly higher risk of leukopenia (RR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.09 to 1.82, P =0.008). Based on the subgroup analyses, the anlotinib plus etoposide group and anlotinib plus irinotecan were superior to the etoposide and the irinotecan groups, respectively, in terms of ORR outcome and DCR outcome. The risk of thrombocytopenia and myelosuppression was higher in the anlotinib plus etoposide group than in the etoposide group. For patients receiving one or NA cycle of therapy before, anlotinib plus CT was superior to CT for DCR outcome, and in patients receiving more than 2 cycles of treatment before, there was a higher risk of myelosuppression outcomes in the anlotinib plus CT group than in the anlotinib group. After more than 2 cycles of treatment, a higher risk of gastrointestinal reaction outcomes in the anlotinib plus CT group than anlotinib group. Conclusions: The findings in the present study suggest that the combination of anlotinib with CT could provide improved PFS, ORR, DCR, and OS in patients with SCLC. This meta-analysis may innovate new prospects in the therapy for SCLC.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?