Safety and Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Kyung Jae Hur,Woong Jin Bae,U-Syn Ha,Soomin Kim,JunJie Piao,Kyung-Hwa Jeon,Cheong Woon Cheon,Dae Up Kang,Jong Woong Lee,Dongho Shin,Sae Woong Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prnil.2024.06.003
IF: 3.07
2024-01-01
Prostate International
Abstract:PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) over an 8-week period in individuals diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) compared to a control group.Materials and MethodsThis prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled 46 participants diagnosed with CP/CPPS, who were randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group in a 2:1 ratio. In the treatment group, ESWT was administered at the perineum once a week for 8 weeks. CP/CPPS-related symptoms were assessed using the National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Pain and erectile function were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF).ResultsThe primary efficacy assessment variable, the change in NIH-CPSI total score at 4 weeks after the end of the 8-week treatment compared to baseline, was significantly improved (p=0.0225) in the treatment group (-11.27±8.39) compared to the control group (-5.44±5.73).Regarding the secondary efficacy assessment variables, the treatment group showed significant decreases compared to the control group in change in NIH-CPSI total score (p=0.0055) at the end of the 8-week treatment compared to baseline, along with significant decreases in pain and quality of life scores as well as VAS assessments at the end of the 8-week treatment and 4 weeks after the end of treatment (p<0.05). Moreover, in the evaluation conducted to assess improvement in sexual function, the treatment group showed a significant increase compared to baseline than the control group in the IIEF total score at 4 weeks after the end of the treatment (p=0.0364). No patients experienced severe side effects related to ESWT during the therapeutic period or the follow-up duration.ConclusionsThe efficacy assessment in this clinical trial indicates that extracorporeal shock wave therapy is expected to have a symptom improvement effect on CP/CPPS
What problem does this paper attempt to address?