Abstract:The two key steps for analyzing proteomic data generated by high-resolution MS are database searching and postprocessing. While the two steps are interrelated, studies on their combinatory effects and the optimization of these procedures have not been adequately conducted. Here, we investigated the performance of three popular search engines (SEQUEST, Mascot, and MS Amanda) in conjunction with five filtering approaches, including respective score-based filtering, a group-based approach, local false discovery rate (LFDR), PeptideProphet, and Percolator. A total of eight data sets from various proteomes (e.g., E. coli, yeast, and human) produced by various instruments with high-accuracy survey scan (MS1) and high- or low-accuracy fragment ion scan (MS2) (LTQ-Orbitrap, Orbitrap-Velos, Orbitrap-Elite, Q-Exactive, Orbitrap-Fusion, and Q-TOF) were analyzed. It was found combinations involving Percolator achieved markedly more peptide and protein identifications at the same FDR level than the other 12 combinations for all data sets. Among these, combinations of SEQUEST-Percolator and MS Amanda-Percolator provided slightly better performances for data sets with low-accuracy MS2 (ion trap or IT) and high accuracy MS2 (Orbitrap or TOF), respectively, than did other methods. For approaches without Percolator, SEQUEST-group performs the best for data sets with MS2 produced by collision-induced dissociation (CID) and IT analysis; Mascot-LFDR gives more identifications for data sets generated by higher-energy collisional dissociation (HCD) and analyzed in Orbitrap (HCD-OT) and in Orbitrap Fusion (HCD-IT); MS Amanda-Group excels for the Q-TOF data set and the Orbitrap Velos HCD-OT data set. Therefore, if Percolator was not used, a specific combination should be applied for each type of data set. Moreover, a higher percentage of multiple-peptide proteins and lower variation of protein spectral counts were observed when analyzing technical replicates using Percolator-associated combinations; therefore, Percolator enhanced the reliability for both identification and quantification. The analyses were performed using the specific programs embedded in Proteome Discoverer, Scaffold, and an in-house algorithm (BuildSummary). These results provide valuable guidelines for the optimal interpretation of proteomic results and the development of fit-for-purpose protocols under different situations.

Identifying PE2 and PE5 Proteins from Existing Mass Spectrometry Data Using Pfind

Finding Missing Proteins from the Epigenetically Manipulated Human Cell with Stringent Quality Criteria.

Structural Bioinformatics Inspection of neXtProt PE5 Proteins in the Human Proteome

Identification of Missing Proteins Defined by Chromosome-Centric Proteome Project in the Cytoplasmic Detergent-Insoluble Proteins.

Digging for Missing Proteins Using Low-Molecular-Weight Protein Enrichment and a “mirror Protease” Strategy

Special Enrichment Strategies Greatly Increase the Efficiency of Missing Proteins Identification from Regular Proteome Samples

Multi-Protease Strategy Identifies Three PE2 Missing Proteins in Human Testis Tissue

Leveraging the Human Panproteome to Enhance Peptide and Protein Identification in Proteomics and Metaproteomics

Open-pFind Enhances the Identification of Missing Proteins from Human Testis Tissue

Open-pFind Verified Four Missing Proteins from Multi-Tissues

Exploration of Missing Proteins by a Combination Approach to Enrich the Low-Abundance Hydrophobic Proteins from Four Cancer Cell Lines

Optimization of Search Engines and Postprocessing Approaches to Maximize Peptide and Protein Identification for High-Resolution Mass Data

Comprehensive Identification of Peptides in Tandem Mass Spectra Using an Efficient Open Search Engine.

Identification of Phosphopeptides with Unknown Cleavage Specificity by a De Novo Sequencing Assisted Database Search Strategy.

Alternative Strategy to Explore Missing Proteins with Low Molecular Weight

Quest for Missing Proteins: Update 2015 on Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project

Digging More Missing Proteins Using an Enrichment Approach with ProteoMiner

Deep Coverage Proteomics Identifies More Low-Abundance Missing Proteins in Human Testis Tissue with Q-Exactive HF Mass Spectrometer

Efficient discovery of abundant post-translational modifications and spectral pairs using peptide mass and retention time differences

Improving Peptide Identification with Single-Stage Mass Spectrum Peaks.

PEAKS DB: De Novo Sequencing Assisted Database Search for Sensitive and Accurate Peptide Identification.