Low‐dose ciclosporin mizoribine and prednisolone in renal transplantation: A new triple‐drug therapy

Yukito Kokado,Michio Ishibashi,Hongsi Jiang,Shiro Takahara,Takao Sonoda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.1990.tb00009.x
1990-08-01
Clinical Transplantation
Abstract:To ensure a beneficial synergistic effect on the acceptance of human transplants and to avoid the nephrotoxicity of CsA, a new triple‐drug therapy using low‐dose ciclosporin (CsA), mizoribine (Mzr) and prednisolone (Pred), has been developed. The results obtained from this new procedure were compared to those of other procedures. Forty‐two living‐related recipients and 12 cadaveric recipients, who received transplants between 1 July, 1987 and 30 June, 1989, were given the new triple‐drug therapy with CsA, Mzr and Pred (group 3). The other patients (73 living‐related and 29 cadaveric) were given a triple (CsA + Aza + Pred, group 2) or double therapy (CsA + Pred, group 1). The 1‐yr actuarial patient survival was 98.6% in group 1, 96.7% in group 2, 100% in group 3, respectively. There were no significant differences. The graft survival rate at 1 yr in group 3 was 91.6%; this was higher compared with 88.9% in group 1 and 90.0% in group 2 (Fig. 1). Among the patients with a functioning graft at 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level was 1.82 $pM 0.13 mg/dl in group 1, 1.85 $pM 0.12 mg/dl in group 2 and 1.53 $pM 0.09 mg/dl in group 3. In group 3, the mean creatinine level was lower than in the other groups. This differences was statistically significant (Fig. 2). There was no differences in the incidence of rejection episodes during the initial 3 months among the three groups (Table 2). However, 24 patients in group 3 had at least one episode of acute rejection, and 19 patients (46.3%) required ALG and/or OKT3 for treatment of steroid‐resistant rejection. Although CsA had to be discontinued or decreased in 12 patients of group 1 and a switch to a new triple‐drug therapy by stopping Aza and starting Mzr was required in 8 patients in group 2 because of complications, only 1 patient in group 3 had to abandon Mzr and increase the dose of CsA because of ileal perforation. This study shows that the new triple‐drug therapy produces greater graft survival without severe complications. The serum creatinine was lower with the new regimen than with other regimens. However, immunosuppression was less powerful. We obtained a beneficial synergistic effect with the new triple‐drug therapy in almost one‐half of the patients in group 3. The new regimen may be considered one of the most beneficial CsA treatment programs.
surgery,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?