Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Dynamics of Global Wetlands by TOPMODEL

Gridded Maps of Wetlands Dynamics over Mid-Low Latitudes for 1980–2020 Based on TOPMODEL

Modeling spatiotemporal dynamics of global wetlands: comprehensive evaluation of a new sub-grid TOPMODEL parameterization and uncertainties

Development of a Global and Dynamic Map of Wetland and Inundated Areas Based on Microwave Remote Sensing Product (GIEMS-2) over 1992-202

Satellite-based modeling of wetland methane emissions on a global scale (SatWetCH4 1.0)

Suitability Mapping of Global Wetland Areas and Validation with Remotely Sensed Data

Development of the global dataset of Wetland Area and Dynamics for Methane Modeling (WAD2M)

Global annual wetland dataset at 30 m with a fine classification system from 2000 to 2022

Modelling Sub-Grid Wetland in the ORCHIDEE Global Land Surface Model: Evaluation Against River Discharges and Remotely Sensed Data

Climate‐Driven Projections of Future Global Wetlands Extent

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Evapotranspiration Simulations in ISIMIP2a—Evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Characteristics with a Comprehensive Ensemble of Independent Datasets

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Mapping Coastal Wetlands of China Using Time Series Landsat Images in 2018 and Google Earth Engine

Global Wetland Methane Emissions From 2001 to 2020: Magnitude, Dynamics and Controls

Understanding coastal wetland hydrology with a new regional‐scale, process‐based hydrological model

Underestimation of Methane Emissions From the Sudd Wetland: Unraveling the Impact of Wetland Extent Dynamics

Modeling potential wetland distributions in China based on geographic big data and machine learning algorithms

Spatiotemporal dynamics of wetlands and their future multi-scenario simulation in the Yellow River Delta, China

Wetlands Cool Land Surface Temperature in Tropical Regions but Warm in Boreal Regions

Assessing the Time Variability of GIEMS-2 Satellite-Derived Surface Water Extent over 30 Years