FSPDA: A Full Sequence Program Data Allocation Scheme for Boosting 3-D Nand Flash Read Performance
Shujie Pang,Yuhui Deng,Zhaorui Wu,Genxiong Zhang,Jie Li,Xiao Qin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2023.3294452
IF: 2.9
2023-01-01
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Abstract:Multibit 3-D NAND flash-based solid-state disks (SSDs), offering high storage density, contain multiple types of pages to accommodate multiple bits per physical cell. Full sequence program or FSP can program multiple pages in a word line at a time, thereby improving write throughput. Unfortunately, large-grained FSP operations coarsely aggregate consecutive logical pages on the same word line, which adversely affects the parallelism and latency of read requests. Moreover, FSP smooths the program latencies for different types of pages, whereas the pages still exhibit various read latencies. Multiple read latencies and lower read parallelism noticeably deteriorate the completion efficiency of read requests: SSD performance is degraded. To address this issue, we propose an FSP data allocation scheme called FSPDA that incorporates the physical structure characteristics of multibit 3-D NAND, aiming to bolster the read performance of 3-D NAND Flash-based SSDs. FSPDA embraces two distinctive and vital features. First, according to the distance between logical pages, FSPDA allocates logical pages to specified parallel units and stipulates that consecutive logical pages must be assigned to different planes, thus improving read parallelism and data locality. Second, to further reduce read latency, FSPDA employs cache hits to determine hot and cold data to be placed to low-latency and high-latency pages, respectively. We compare FSPDA with two state-of-the-art schemes—OSPADA and single-operation-multiple-location—in terms of multiplane read (MPR) counts, read response time, and GC counts under eight real-world workloads. The experimental results show that compared with the existing schemes, FSPDA slashes the number of MPR counts, read response time, and the number of GC counts by an average of 34.4%, 28.5%, and 13.6%, respectively.