Abstract:Bees are important pollinators of wild and domesticated flowering plant species. Over the last 30 years, an increasing number of scientific articles have been published on the ecology and conservation of wild bees. To achieve research goals, many studies have pursued the lethal take of wild bees. Although the impact of lethal take for scientific pursuits is likely negligible compared to the negative impacts of human‐mediated phenomena such as climate change, urbanization, and agricultural intensification, it is important to evaluate the history of lethal take on scientific endeavors. In our study, we evaluated a random sample of 30 years of scientific publications on wild bees. Across 1426 surveyed publications, 536 reported the lethal take of wild bees. We found that 61% of these studies lethally captured wild bees primarily for species identification. Furthermore, we determined passive sampling of wild bees resulted in substantially more lethal collections than active methods per study. However, combined approaches of passive and active collection resulted in the greatest lethal take of wild bees per study. Finally, we determined that 64% of the studies did not provide deposition information for their samples, hindering additional research that could be done with them. The increasing availability of video and photographic devices and artificial intelligence approaches to identification, the development of low and noninvasive molecular methods, and the ease of sharing information, allow for a timely discussion on alternative routes and potentially new best practices in bee research. We focus our discussion on alternative methods for minimizing lethal captures for identification purposes and through passive methods, and for maximizing the utility of the data collected. Finally, we provide a framework for continued engagement among researchers and managers to develop strategies that can contribute to reducing our impact on wild bee communities and making the most of collected specimens. To achieve research goals, many studies have pursued the lethal capture of wild bees. We conducted a literature search of last 30 years of scientific research on wild bees and we found that 61% of studies (from a random sample of the total) lethally captured wild bees, primarily for species identification and with passive sampling methods. We then discuss the current available alternative methods for minimizing lethal captures and maximizing the utility of the data collected, and thus, for reducing our impact on wild bee communities.

Advancing bee conservation in the US: gaps and opportunities in data collection and reporting

Completeness analysis for over 3000 United States bee species identifies persistent data gap

Indicators of a data-deficient taxa: combining bird and environmental data enhances predictive accuracy of wild bee richness

Understanding and addressing shortfalls in European wild bee data

A century of wild bee sampling: historical data and neural network analysis reveal ecological traits associated with species loss

Improving wild bee monitoring, sampling methods, and conservation

Fine-Scale Models of Bee Species Diversity and Habitat in New York State

Bringing population ecology back to wild bees

Recent and future declines of a historically widespread pollinator linked to climate, land cover, and pesticides

Harnessing community science to conserve and study ground-nesting bee aggregations

Pursuing best practices for minimizing wild bee captures to support biological research

Bumble Bee Watch community science program increases scientific understanding of an important pollinator group across Canada and the USA

The State of Bee Monitoring in the United States: A Call to Refocus Away From Bowl Traps and Towards More Effective Methods

Wild bee pollination networks in northern New England

Inferring long-term and short-term determinants of genetic diversity in honey bees: Beekeeping impact and conservation strategies

Wild bee species abundance and richness across an urban–rural gradient

Status of pollinators in North America

A globally synthesised and flagged bee occurrence dataset and cleaning workflow

Holistic wild bee management in urban spaces

Estimating genus-specific effects of non-native honey bees and urbanization on wild bee communities: A case study in Maryland, United States

Fecal sampling protocol to assess bumble bee health in conservation research