Letter to the editor: critical evaluation of the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the illumina MethylationEPIC v1.0 BeadChip microarrays

Julian Hecker,Scott T. Weiss,Jessica A. Lasky-Su,Dawn L. DeMeo,Christoph Lange
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2024.2411470
2024-10-06
Epigenetics
Abstract:Keywords: In their recent work, Zhang et al. comprehensively evaluated the reliability of DNA methylation probes on the Illumina MethylationEPIC v1.0 BeadChip microarray using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated based on duplicated samples [ Citation 1 ]. Using the observed ICCs, they classified probes into the four reliability categories 'Excellent,' 'Good,' 'Fair,' and 'Poor,' and shared their results with the readership, creating a valuable resource for future studies. Their downstream analyses demonstrated that higher probe reliability is associated with more consistent results in epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) and other integrative omics studies. Importantly, Zhang et al. noted the non-ignorable impact of batch effects when analyzing DNA methylation microarray data and considered duplicates measured on different methylation plates. In line with this argument, they observed that the median ICC increased from 0.325 to 0.733 when considering duplicated samples placed on the same methylation plate.
genetics & heredity,biochemistry & molecular biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?