Stability and Accuracy of Fat Quantification on Photon-Counting Detector CT with Various Scan Settings: A Phantom Study

Xu Zhang,Shouyu Bao,Mengzhen Wang,Zhihan Xu,Fuhua Yan,Wenjie Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111545
IF: 4.531
2024-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Objective: Fat deposition is an important marker of many metabolic diseases. As a noninvasive and convenient examination method, CT has been widely used for fat quantification. With the clinical application of photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT, we aimed to investigate the accuracy, stability, and dose level of PCD-CT using various scan settings for fat quantification. Materials and Methods: Eleven agar-based lipid-containing phantoms (vials with different fat fractions [FFs]; range: 0 % -100 %) were scanned using PCD-CT. Three scanning types (sequence scan, regular spiral scan with a pitch of 0.8, and high-pitch spiral scan with a pitch of 3.2), four tube voltages (90, 120, 140, and 100 kV with a tin filter), and three image quality (IQ) levels (IQ levels of 20, 40, and 80) were alternated, and each scan setting was used twice. For each scan, a 70-keV image was generated using the same reconstruction parameters. A regular spiral scan at 120 kV with IQ80 was used to transfer the CT numbers of all scans to the FF. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland -Altman analysis were implemented for accuracy and agreement evaluation, and group differences were compared using analysis of variance. Results: Excellent agreement and accuracy of FF derived by PCD-CT with all scan settings was demonstrated by high ICCs ( >0.9; range: 0.929 -0.998, p < 0.017) and low bias ( <5% range: -2.9 % -5%). The root mean square error (RMSE) between the PCD-CT-acquired FF and the reference standard ranged from 1.0 % to 5.0 %, among which the high-pitch scan at 120 kV with IQ20 accounted for the lowest RMSE (1.0 %). The spiral scan at 120 kV with IQ20 and IQ80 yielded the lowest bias (mean value: 1.19 % and 1.23 %, respectively). Conclusion: Fat quantification using PCD-CT reconstructed at 70 keV was accurate and stable under various scan settings. PCD-CT has great potential for fat quantification using ultralow radiation doses.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?