The Environmental Fee-for-tax Reform in China: a One-Size-fits-all Solution for Environmental Problems?

Tianbao Qin,Ping Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199577989.003.0032

2009-01-01

Abstract:Abstract China faces a serious environmental situation. The environment’s limited load capacity and the need to meet energy-emission-reduction targets has led to the introduction of successful examples of environmental governance from economically advanced countries. Economic incentives are one such valuable example. Currently, the most significant economic incentive to control pollution emission is the pollution discharge fee (PDF) system. This system started in 1982. Over the past 20 years it has played an important role in pollution-emission control and environmental protection. However, many problems remain: for example, the low collection rate, the lack of transparency in procedures, the uncertainty of the scope and amount of charge, as well as arbitrariness and confusion in using the fee, etc. Compared to the existing fee system, the environmental taxation system has obvious advantages, with its mandatory implementation, stability, and standardization, and the use of the taxes as earmarked. In the light of the successful experiences of environment tax in foreign countries and China’s lack of success with the PDF, many have strongly argued that China immediately abolish the PDF system, and establish an environmental taxation system (‘feefor- tax reform’).