Abstract:Federated learning, as a distributed machine learning framework, aims to protect data privacy while addressing the issue of data silos by collaboratively training models across multiple clients. However, a significant challenge to federated learning arises from the non-independent and identically distributed (non-iid) nature of data across different clients. non-iid data can lead to inconsistencies between the minimal loss experienced by individual clients and the global loss observed after the central server aggregates the local models, affecting the model's convergence speed and generalization capability. To address this challenge, we propose a novel federated learning algorithm based on update bias (FedUB). Unlike traditional federated learning approaches such as FedAvg and FedProx, which independently update model parameters on each client before direct aggregation to form a global model, the FedUB algorithm incorporates an update bias in the loss function of local models—specifically, the difference between each round's local model updates and the global model updates. This design aims to reduce discrepancies between local and global updates, thus aligning the parameters of locally updated models more closely with those of the globally aggregated model, thereby mitigating the fundamental conflict between local and global optima. Additionally, during the aggregation phase at the server side, we introduce a metric called the bias metric, which assesses the similarity between each client's local model and the global model. This metric adaptively sets the weight of each client during aggregation after each training round to achieve a better global model. Extensive experiments conducted on multiple datasets have confirmed the effectiveness of the FedUB algorithm. The results indicate that FedUB generally outperforms methods such as FedDC, FedDyn, and Scaffold, especially in scenarios involving partial client participation and non-iid data distributions. It demonstrates superior performance and faster convergence in tasks such as image classification.

Multi-Objective Federated Learning: Balancing Global Performance and Individual Fairness

Fair Federated Learning with Multi-Objective Hyperparameter Optimization

Fairness and Accuracy in Federated Learning

Fairness-Aware Client Selection for Federated Learning

Multi-Dimensional Fair Federated Learning

Addressing Algorithmic Disparity and Performance Inconsistency in Federated Learning

FedUP: Bridging Fairness and Efficiency in Cross-Silo Federated Learning

Fairness and Accuracy in Horizontal Federated Learning

Federated Learning Meets Multi-objective Optimization

Fair Concurrent Training of Multiple Models in Federated Learning

An Efficient Multi-Model Training Algorithm for Federated Learning

Anti-Matthew FL: Bridging the Performance Gap in Federated Learning to Counteract the Matthew Effect

Mitigating Group Bias in Federated Learning: Beyond Local Fairness

Ada‐FFL: Adaptive Computing Fairness Federated Learning

FedLaw: Value-Aware Federated Learning with Individual Fairness and Coalition Stability

FedUB: Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Update Bias

Minimax Demographic Group Fairness in Federated Learning

Heterogeneity-aware Fair Federated Learning

Fairness-aware Federated Minimax Optimization with Convergence Guarantee

FedHF: A High Fairness Federated Learning Algorithm Based on Deconfliction in Heterogeneous Networks.

Federated Learning with Fair Averaging