Supplementary Figure 6 from Memory/Active T-Cell Activation Is Associated with Immunotherapeutic Response in Fumarate Hydratase–Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma

Junru Chen,Xu Hu,Junjie Zhao,Xiaoxue Yin,Linmao Zheng,Jingjing Guo,Jianhui Chen,Yongquan Wang,Xinan Sheng,Haiying Dong,Xiaodong Liu,Xingming Zhang,Jiayu Liang,Haolin Liu,Jin Yao,Jiyan Liu,Yali Shen,Zhibin Chen,Zhengyu He,Yaodong Wang,Ni Chen,Ling Nie,Mengni Zhang,Xiuyi Pan,Yuntian Chen,Haoyang Liu,Yaowen Zhang,Yanfeng Tang,Sha Zhu,Jinge Zhao,Jindong Dai,Zilin Wang,Yuhao Zeng,Zhipeng Wang,Haojie Huang,Zhenhua Liu,Pengfei Shen,Hao Zeng,Guangxi Sun
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.25956509.v1
2024-01-01
Abstract:Supplementary Figure 6. Validation of the FH-deficient RCC immune signature. (A) UMAP plot showing expression of selected genes; (B) Correlations between the expression of six genes in the FH-deficient RCC immune signature and treatment response, significance of differential signature expression (q value) was determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni FDR correction; (C) Correlations between the expression of FH-deficient RCC signature and several immune related hallmark pathways, significance of differential signature expression (q value) was determined by two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test with Bonferroni FDR correction. *, q<0.05; **, q<0.01; ***, q<0.001; ****, q<0.0001.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?