Sczag: Integrating ZINB-Based Autoencoder with Adaptive Data Augmentation Graph Contrastive Learning for Scrna-Seq Clustering

Tianjiao Zhang,Jixiang Ren,Liangyu Li,Zhenao Wu,Ziheng Zhang,Guanghui Dong,Guohua Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25115976
IF: 5.6
2024-01-01
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Abstract:Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) is widely used to interpret cellular states, detect cell subpopulations, and study disease mechanisms. In scRNA-seq data analysis, cell clustering is a key step that can identify cell types. However, scRNA-seq data are characterized by high dimensionality and significant sparsity, presenting considerable challenges for clustering. In the high-dimensional gene expression space, cells may form complex topological structures. Many conventional scRNA-seq data analysis methods focus on identifying cell subgroups rather than exploring these potential high-dimensional structures in detail. Although some methods have begun to consider the topological structures within the data, many still overlook the continuity and complex topology present in single-cell data. We propose a deep learning framework that begins by employing a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model to denoise the highly sparse and over-dispersed scRNA-seq data. Next, scZAG uses an adaptive graph contrastive representation learning approach that combines approximate personalized propagation of neural predictions graph convolution (APPNPGCN) with graph contrastive learning methods. By using APPNPGCN as the encoder for graph contrastive learning, we ensure that each cell's representation reflects not only its own features but also its position in the graph and its relationships with other cells. Graph contrastive learning exploits the relationships between nodes to capture the similarity among cells, better representing the data's underlying continuity and complex topology. Finally, the learned low-dimensional latent representations are clustered using Kullback-Leibler divergence. We validated the superior clustering performance of scZAG on 10 common scRNA-seq datasets in comparison to existing state-of-the-art clustering methods.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?