Do we really need ligands in Ir-catalyzed C–H borylation?

Tomas Smejkal,Janis M. Zakis,Simone L. Kuhn,Joanna Wencel-Delord
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-xpn8c
2024-05-29
Abstract:Direct borylation of C–H bonds is a privileged strategy to access versatile building blocks and valuable derivatives of complex molecules (late-stage functionalization, metabolite synthesis). This perspective aims to provide an overview and classification of the catalytic systems developed in this fast-growing area of research. Unexpected selectivity differences between two established directed-borylation systems have been discovered using high-throughput experimentation highlighting the importance of classical control experiments in catalysis research.
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The issue discussed in this paper is whether a ligand is really necessary in the iridium-catalyzed boronation of C-H bonds. The study has found unexpected selectivity differences between two established directing boronation systems through high-throughput experiments, emphasizing the importance of conducting classic control experiments in catalytic research. The paper compares the C-H boronation reactions using a catalyst with an amine ligand (ImIr-4) and without a ligand, and it is found that the ligand-free conditions exhibit good orthogonal selectivity for certain directing groups containing S or N, especially when handling substrates such as esters, amides, and bulky ketones. Although catalysts with amine ligands are generally more efficient, the study reveals that a ligand-free approach can be used for directing orthogonal boronations in specific cases. This highlights the necessity of performing comparative experiments when developing new ligands or exploring new substrates, particularly in late-stage functionalizations of bioactive molecules.