Abstract:Abstract Performance-related-pay (PRP) is a controversial topic. Views about its impact are mixed. Through a meta-analysis of studies in public administration, we aim to provide an evidence-based answer to the question: Does PRP work? Our meta-analysis finds a statistically significant, positive but small population effect size between PRP and employee and performance outcomes. Subgroup analyses show that PRPs impact is contingent upon the type of outcome, geographical context, government level, and data source rather than universal in nature. Effect sizes decrease when performance outcomes are measured as opposed to employee outcomes; in USA and European contexts compared to Asian contexts; at the local level compared to the federal level; and when multiple source or experimental data are used compared to single source data. Based on our findings and PRP literature, we construct a flowchart to support practitioners in deciding whether PRP may “work” for them while avoiding its many and typical pitfalls. Evidence for practice Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the impact of performance-related-pay (PRP) on employee and performance outcomes in public administration is statistically significant and positive; however, the fact that the effects sizes are small leads us to conclude that PRP is not a “magic bullet”. Intriguingly, performance outcomes are less impacted by PRP than employee-related outcomes like work motivation and job satisfaction, implying that PRP might carry some motivational benefits while its benefits for better performance outcomes are questionable. PRP seemingly works better in Asia than in Europe or the USA – arguably due to existing predispositions regarding the effects of rewards and monetary incentives – and also seems more effective at the federal than the local government level. Much of the small positive impact uncovered in this meta-analysis seems to be the result of the type of data used in studies. Specifically, studies using multiple or experimental data show a trivial and statistically insignificant overall impact. Practitioners thus need to carefully assess how they will evaluate PRPs impact to avoid biases due to data type. An evidence-based flowchart including questions at the macro (cultural and societal considerations), meso (specific organizational characteristics), and micro (individual and team behavior) level is presented as a support tool for practitioners in deciding upon and designing PRP systems in their organization.

Tradeoffs in the Power of Regulatory Regimes

Performance based regulation in electricity and cost benchmarking: theoretical underpinnings and application

Does Performance-Related-Pay Work? Recommendations for Practice Based on a Meta-Analysis

Optimal Equilibrium Selection of Price-maker Agents in Performance-based Regulation Market

Optimal Parameter Setting of Performance Based Regulation with Reward and Penalty

Governance, CEO Power, and Relative Performance Evaluation Effectiveness

PERFORMANCE BASED PRICE REGULATION FOR ELECTRIC POWER INDUSTRY

The Role of Common Risk in the Effectiveness of Explicit Relative Performance Evaluation

Performance Management Goldilocks Style: A Transaction Cost Analysis of Incentive Intensity in Performance Regimes

Rocking the Boat: How Relative Performance Evaluation Affects Corporate Risk Taking

The contractual and administrative regulation of public-private partnership

Peer Learning, Strategic Experimentation, and Regulator Reputation

Regulatory design and incentives for renewable energy

The impact of the under enforcement of RPS in China: An evolutionary approach

Performance-based funding for higher education: how well does neoliberal theory capture neoliberal practice?

Performance management effectiveness: lessons from world-leading firms

Responsive regulation for water PPP: Balancing commitment and adaptability in the face of uncertainty

Performance-Related Payment in the Public Sector: Theoretical Issues and Results from a Case Study of a Brazilian Government Agency

Optimal Regulatory Enforcement

A regulatory focus theory perspective on the dynamics between action and power.

Rational consumer decisions in a peak time rebate program