Abstract:<p class="a-plus-plus">The ionospheric mapping function (MF) converts the line-of-sight slant total electron content (STEC) into the vertical total electron content (VTEC) and vice versa, and it is an important function in the creation and use of ionospheric models. Most of the existing MFs are only related to satellite elevation angle, the accuracy is low, and it is necessary to establish a MF with higher accuracy. Therefore, this paper considers the differences of MF for different local time (LT) and DOY (day of year), and uses the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) STEC observation data from International GNSS Service (IGS) tracking stations in the northern hemisphere mid-latitude region in 2016–2020 to establish a novel MF model. First, we retrieve the mapping coefficient <span class="a-plus-plus inline-equation id-i-eq1"><span class="a-plus-plus equation-source format-t-e-x"><span class="mjpage"><svg xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" width="2.667ex" height="2.009ex" style="vertical-align: -0.671ex;" viewBox="0 -576.1 1148.1 865.1" role="img" focusable="false" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><g stroke="currentColor" fill="currentColor" stroke-width="0" transform="matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)"> <use xlink:href="#MJMATHI-3B1" x="0" y="0"></use> <use transform="scale(0.707)" xlink:href="#MJMATHI-68" x="905" y="-213"></use></g></svg></span></span></span> for different LT and DOY, where the results show significant correlation with LT and DOY, and other periodic variations. Then, we use the empirical orthogonal functions (EOF) to decompose the time series, and the first four order EOF components can describe 98.31% of the total variability. Finally, the periodic function is used to fit the time series of EOF, and a small number of model coefficients are obtained. This work employs the differential STEC of 28 IGS tracking stations in the mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere in 2020 to verify the accuracy of the new MF and compare it with the widely used modified single-layer model (MSLM) MF. The results show that the accuracy of the new MF is higher than the existing MSLM MF when using JPLG (Jet Propulsion Laboratory's final Global Ionospheric Maps) to convert VTEC to STEC. Compared with MSLM MF, the RMS of the new MF is reduced by 0.24 TECU on average, and the maximum reduction is close to 0.4 TECU (~ 25%). Among the 28 tracking stations that participated in the verification, the new MF is better than MSLM MF on most days, with 7 stations reaching 100% and 20 stations exceeding 95%. For nearly 60% of the days in 2020, the accuracy of the new MF for all tracking stations is better than that of MSLM MF.</p><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;"><defs id="MathJax_SVG_glyphs"><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-3B1" d="M34 156Q34 270 120 356T309 442Q379 442 421 402T478 304Q484 275 485 237V208Q534 282 560 374Q564 388 566 390T582 393Q603 393 603 385Q603 376 594 346T558 261T497 161L486 147L487 123Q489 67 495 47T514 26Q528 28 540 37T557 60Q559 67 562 68T577 70Q597 70 597 62Q597 56 591 43Q579 19 556 5T512 -10H505Q438 -10 414 62L411 69L400 61Q390 53 370 41T325 18T267 -2T203 -11Q124 -11 79 39T34 156ZM208 26Q257 26 306 47T379 90L403 112Q401 255 396 290Q382 405 304 405Q235 405 183 332Q156 292 139 224T121 120Q121 71 146 49T208 26Z"></path><path stroke-width="1" id="MJMATHI-68" d="M137 683Q138 683 209 688T282 694Q294 694 294 685Q294 674 258 534Q220 386 220 383Q220 381 227 388Q288 442 357 442Q411 442 444 415T478 336Q478 285 440 178T402 50Q403 36 407 31T422 26Q450 26 474 56T513 138Q516 149 519 151T535 153Q555 153 555 145Q555 144 551 130Q535 71 500 33Q466 -10 419 -10H414Q367 -10 346 17T325 74Q325 90 361 192T398 345Q398 404 354 404H349Q266 404 205 306L198 293L164 158Q132 28 127 16Q114 -11 83 -11Q69 -11 59 -2T48 16Q48 30 121 320L195 616Q195 629 188 632T149 637H128Q122 643 122 645T124 664Q129 683 137 683Z"></path></defs></svg>

A Survey for GNSS Application of Ionospheric Information Extraction, Modeling, and Forecasting Techniques

Global forecasting of ionospheric vertical total electron contents via ConvLSTM with spectrum analysis

Global Ionospheric Modeling Using Multi-GNSS and Upcoming LEO Constellations: Two Methods and Comparison

Ionospheric temporal-spatial correlation analysis using gnss networks over china

Accuracy Assessment of the Global Ionospheric Model over the Southern Ocean Based on Dynamic Observation

Global and Local Consistency Methodology for Ionospheric Dstec Interpolation

Ionospheric Assimilation of GNSS TEC into IRI Model Using a Local Ensemble Kalman Filter

Global Ionospheric Tomography Based on Data-Driven Fusion Algorithm Using GNSS

Ionospheric VTEC Prediction Model in Low-Latitude Regions Based on LSTM Neural Network

Signal Processing Techniques in Ionosphere Sounding and Trace Extraction from Ionograms

Computerized Ionospheric Tomography Based on the ADS-B System

Global ionospheric maps forecasting based on an adaptive autoregressive modeling of grid point VTEC values

A novel ionospheric mapping function modeling at regional scale using empirical orthogonal functions and GNSS data

Ionospheric Tomography Model Driven by Dynamic Measured Data and Its Multi-GNSS Verification

Prediction of global ionospheric VTEC maps using an adaptive autoregressive model

Modeling and Forecasting Ionospheric foF2 Variation Based on CNN-BiLSTM-TPA during Low- and High-Solar Activity Years

Ionospheric TEC Data Assimilation Based on Gauss–Markov Kalman Filter

An Ionospheric TEC Forecasting Model Based on a CNN-LSTM-Attention Mechanism Neural Network

Multilayer Ionospheric Model Constrained by Physical Prior Based on GNSS Stations

Global 4-D Ionospheric STEC Prediction Based on DeepONet for GNSS Rays

Arctic TEC Mapping Using Integrated LEO-Based GNSS-R and Ground-Based GNSS Observations: A Simulation Study