The Paradox of Picroside II: As a Natural Antioxidant, but May Instead Futher Aggravate Liver Injury by Exacerbating Mitochondrial Oxidative Stress.

Yifan Xu,Jingfeng Huang,Huichuan Zhuang,Junqian Lin,Zhenzhou Jiang,Sun Lixin,Huang Xin,Luyong Zhang,Tao Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/toxres/tfae073

2024-01-01

Toxicology Research

Abstract:Background:Picroside II (PII), an iridoid glycoside extracted from the rhizomes and stems of the genus Picroside, exhibits pronounced hepatoprotective properties. Pre-administration of PII protects against acute liver injury caused by D-galactosamine (D-Gal), carbon tetrachloride (CCl4), and acetaminophen (APAP). This study aimed to elucidate the ramifications of PII administration subsequent to the initiation of acute hepatic injury.Methods:Exploring the role of PII treatment in APAP-treated cell and rat models and in D-Gal and CCl4-treated rat models.Results:In rats, APAP treatment increased serum aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, and alkaline phosphatase levels and decreased glutathione activity and the fluidity of the liver mitochondrial membrane. In L-02 cells, APAP exposure resulted in a decrement in membrane potential, an augmentation in the liberation of reactive oxygen species, and an acceleration of apoptotic processes. Moreover, PII pre-administration protected against D-Gal-induced acute hepatic injury and CCl4-induced chronic hepatic injury in rodent models, whereas PII administration post-injury aggravated CCl4-induced chronic hepatic injury.Conclusions:Our results suggest that the effects of PII depend on the hepatic physiological or pathological state at the time of intervention. While PII possesses the potential to avert drug-induced acute hepatic injury through the mitigation of oxidative stress, its administration post-injury may exacerbate the hepatic damage, underscoring the critical importance of timing in therapeutic interventions.