An Expanded Cysteine-Rich Receptor-Like Kinase Gene Cluster Functionally Differentiates in Drought, Cold, Heat, and Pathogen Stress Responses in Rice

Tiantian Ye,Huaijun Wang,Chengjing An,Haifu Tu,Lingqun Zhang,Dan Hu,Haiyan Xiong,Lizhong Xiong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pbi.14381
IF: 13.8
2024-01-01
Plant Biotechnology Journal
Abstract:Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) are crucial for plant stress responses. Cysteine-rich receptor-like kinases (CRKs), a significant RLK subfamily, typically possess a signal peptide, one to four extracellular DUF26 domains, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular serine/threonine kinase domain (Chen, 2001). CRKs are land plant-specific, being present in vascular plants but absent in bryophytes and algae. They have expanded evolutionarily through tandem duplications (Vaattovaara et al., 2019). In Arabidopsis, CRKs exhibit responses to various environmental stimuli, influencing stress tolerance (Bourdais et al., 2015; Zeiner et al., 2023; Zhang et al., 2023). For example, AtCRK2 enhances salt tolerance and immunity (Hunter et al., 2019; Kimura et al., 2020); AtCRK5 and AtCRK22 respond to Verticillium dahliae toxins (Zhao et al., 2022); AtCRK4 contributes to drought tolerance (Zhao et al., 2023). Despite the known importance of CRKs, a comprehensive analysis of their functions in rice has been lacking. This study aimed to systematically investigate the phylogeny of the rice CRK family, and explore the functional divergence of an expanded OsCRK cluster in environmental adaptability. Using AtCRK2 as a reference, we identified 54 CRK homologues in the rice, categorized into four phylogenetic groups (Figure 1a–c). Groups I and II align closely with AtCRK2, representing the basal clade with less divergence. Groups III and IV, forming the variable clade, show distinct phylogenetic clustering, indicating recent evolutionary divergence. Notably, chromosome 7 (Chr7) harbours 61.1% (33 out of 54) of OsCRKs, with 27 OsCRKs densely arrayed within the 20.96–21.44 Mb region, forming a significant OsCRK cluster (Figure S1). OsCRK33 and OsCRK36 within this cluster may be pseudo-CRKs, due to lacking the extracellular DUF26 domain and transmembrane region (Figure 1b). Meanwhile, a small cluster on Chr12 exhibits a simpler gene structure (Figure S1), potentially representing ancestral OsCRKs (Figure 1c). These clusters likely formed through gene tandem duplication events, which played a major driving force for CRK evolution (Vaattovaara et al., 2019). To explore the evolutionary conservation of CRK gene clusters in crops, we conducted a collinearity analysis involving rice, barley, wheat, and maize (Figure 1d). The locus on rice Chr7 containing the CRK cluster has high collinearity with barley Chr2, wheat chromosome 2A/2B/2D, and maize Chr7 (Figure 1d), indicating the potential presence of CRK clusters before ancestral divergence. Notably, the rice collinear CRK cluster on Chr7 shows substantial expansion compared with those in barley, wheat, and maize (Figure 1e). This expansion raises questions about whether tandem expansion drives CRK functional diversification, such as subfunctionalization and neofunctionalization in rice. Using CRISPR/Cas9, we generated large-scale knockout mutants within the OsCRK cluster on Chr7. Guide RNAs targeting individual or multiple OsCRKs produced mutants for 25 OsCRKs (Figure 1c and Table S1). Comparative analysis of the morphological and developmental traits between mutants and the wild-type (Zhonghua 11) during planting and harvesting stages revealed no significant differences (Figure S2), suggesting potential functional redundancy or indirect involvement of these OsCRKs in rice growth and development. We further investigated the stress-responsive expression patterns of OsCRKs within the cluster on Chr7 and found that numerous members exhibited responses to various abiotic stresses (Figure 1f). Drought stress screening showed increased drought sensitivity in mutants like oscrk22/27, oscrk29, oscrk31, and oscrk35 at the seedling stage (Figure S3). During panicle development stage, oscrk14, oscrk22/27, oscrk29, and oscrk31 mutants showed earlier wilting (Figure 1g) under drought stress and reduced seed-setting rates after recovery (Figure 1h). Low temperature reduced survival rates in oscrk13 single mutant and oscrk34/37/38 triple mutant (Figure 1i,j). Natural high-temperature conditions in the field led to lower seed-setting rates in oscrk15/20 and oscrk31 mutants (Figure 1k and Figure S4). Upon Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) strain inoculation, oscrk16/17/18 triple mutant and oscrk32/33 double mutant exhibited longer lesions compared with the wild-type (Figure 1l), indicating roles in rice disease resistance. Overall, OsCRK31 regulates multiple stress tolerances like drought and heat, while others like OsCRK22/27 and OsCRK29 specialize in drought resistance, OsCRK13 and OsCRK34/37/38 in low-temperature tolerance, OsCRK15/20 in high-temperature tolerance, and OsCRK16/17/18 and OsCRK32/33 in bacterial disease resistance. In summary, our study systematically analysed the rice CRK family, revealing that OsCRK clusters formed through tandem duplication, a process conserved in grasses but expanded in rice. OsCRKs within the cluster on Chr7 exhibit diverse roles in responding to drought, cold, heat, and pathogen stresses. The tandem amplification potentially contributed to the diverse evolution of OsCRK functions, improving rice's environmental adaptability. This research provides novel insights into the evolution and function of the OsCRKs, offering potential genetic resources for rice stress resistance improvement. These findings also have broader implications for stress resistance research in other crops. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U21A20207, 31930080, 31821005, and 32272041), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF1001604), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2662022SKQD003 and 2662022YJ009), the Innovative Project of Hubei Hongshan Laboratory (2022hszd015), and the Wuhan Knowledge Innovation Special Project (2022020801020232). The authors declare no conflict of interest. L.X. and H.X. designed the project. T.Y. generated the mutants. H.W. analysed the data. T.Y., H.W., C.A., H.T., and L.Z. performed the experiments. T.Y., H.W., H.X., and L.X. wrote the manuscript. The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Rice cold treatment RNA-seq at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, reference number PRJNA1102144. Figure S1 Chromosomal distribution of OsCRK genes. Figure S2 Effect of oscrk mutations on plant height and tiller numbers. Figure S3 Effects of oscrk mutations on drought tolerance at the seedling stage. Figure S4 Temperature trends during the rice reproductive stage under natural heat stress conditions in the field. Table S1 Guide RNAs and gene editing results of oscrk mutants. Table S2 List of PCR primers for genotyping of oscrk mutants. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?