Abstract:Deep learning models have been widely used in electroencephalogram (EEG) analysis and obtained excellent performance. But the adversarial attack and defense for them should be thoroughly studied before putting them into safety-sensitive use. This work exposes an important safety issue in deep-learning-based brain disease diagnostic systems by examining the vulnerability of deep learning models for diagnosing epilepsy with brain electrical activity mappings (BEAMs) to white-box attacks. It proposes two methods, Gradient Perturbations of BEAMs (GPBEAM), and Gradient Perturbations of BEAMs with Differential Evolution (GPBEAM-DE), which generate EEG adversarial samples, for the first time by perturbing BEAMs densely and sparsely respectively, and find that these BEAMs-based adversarial samples can easily mislead deep learning models. The experiments use the EEG data from CHB-MIT dataset and two types of victim models each of which has four different deep neural network (DNN) architectures. It is shown that: (1) these BEAM-based adversarial samples produced by the proposed methods in this paper are aggressive to BEAM-related victim models which use BEAMs as the input to internal DNN architectures, but unaggressive to EEG-related victim models which have raw EEG as the input to internal DNN architectures, with the top success rate of attacking BEAM-related models up to 0.8 while the top success rate of attacking EEG-related models only 0.01; (2) GPBEAM-DE outperforms GPBEAM when they are attacking the same victim model under a same distortion constraint, with the top attack success rate 0.8 for the former and 0.59 for the latter; (3) a simple modification to the GPBEAM/GPBEAM-DE will make it have aggressiveness to both BEAMs-related and EEG-related models (with top attack success rate 0.8 and 0.64), and this capacity enhancement is done without any cost of distortion increment. The goal of this study is not to attack any of EEG medical diagnostic systems, but to raise concerns about the safety of deep learning models and hope to lead to a safer design.

Adversarial sample detection for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces

Adversarial artifact detection in EEG-based brain-computer interfaces

Adversarial Training for the Adversarial Robustness of EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces

Adversarial Filtering Based Evasion and Backdoor Attacks to EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces

Alignment-Based Adversarial Training (ABAT) for Improving the Robustness and Accuracy of EEG-Based BCIs

On the Vulnerability of CNN Classifiers in EEG-Based BCIs

Perturbing BEAMs: EEG adversarial attack to deep learning models for epilepsy diagnosing

Adversarial Stimuli: Attacking Brain-Computer Interfaces via Perturbed Sensory Events

Reducing the Subject Variability of EEG Signals with Adversarial Domain Generalization

Universal adversarial perturbations for CNN classifiers in EEG-based BCIs

Time-Frequency Jointed Imperceptible Adversarial Attack to Brainprint Recognition with Deep Learning Models

SSVEP-based brain-computer interfaces are vulnerable to square wave attacks

Sample Dominance Aware Framework via Non-Parametric Estimation for Spontaneous Brain-Computer Interface

Improving the performance of SSVEP-BCI contaminated by physiological noise via adversarial training

Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learning

Assessing robustness to adversarial attacks in attention-based networks: Case of EEG-based motor imagery classification

Adversarial Neural Network Training for Secure and Robust Brain-to-Brain Communication

Advances in Brain-Inspired Deep Neural Networks for Adversarial Defense

Subdomain Adversarial Network for Motor Imagery EEG Classification Using Graph Data

Detection by Attack: Detecting Adversarial Samples by Undercover Attack

Adversarial Attacks and Defenses Against Deep Neural Networks: A Survey