Abstract:While the cloudification of networks with a micro-services-oriented design is a well-known feature of 5G, the 6G era of networks is closely related to intelligent network orchestration and management. Consequently, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) have a big part to play in the 6G paradigm that is being imagined. Future end-to-end automation of networks requires proactive threat detection, the use of clever mitigation strategies, and confirmation that 6G networks will be self-sustaining. To strengthen and consolidate the role of AI in safeguarding 6G networks, this article explores how AI may be employed in 6G security. In order to achieve this, a novel anomaly detection system for 6G networks (AD6GNs) based on ensemble learning (EL) for communication networks was redeveloped in this study. The first stage in the EL-ADCN process is pre-processing. The second stage is the feature selection approach. It applies the reimplemented hybrid approach using a comparison of the ensemble learning and feature selection random forest algorithms (CFS-RF). NB2015, CIC_IDS2017, NSL KDD, and CICDDOS2019 are the three datasets, each given a reduced dimensionality, and the top subset characteristic for each is determined separately. Hybrid EL techniques are used in the third step to find intrusions. The average voting methodology is employed as an aggregation method, and two classifiers—support vector machines (SVM) and random forests (RF)—are modified to be used as EL algorithms for bagging and adaboosting, respectively. Testing the concept of the last step involves employing classification forms that are binary and multi-class. The best experimental results were obtained by applying 30, 35, 40, and 40 features of the reimplemented system to the three datasets: NSL_KDD, UNSW_NB2015, CIC_IDS2017, and CICDDOS2019. For the NSL_KDD dataset, the accuracy was 99.5% with a false alarm rate of 0.0038; the accuracy was 99.9% for the UNSW_NB2015 dataset with a false alarm rate of 0.0076; and the accuracy was 99.8% for the CIC_IDS2017 dataset with a false alarm rate of 0.0009. However, the accuracy was 99.95426% for the CICDDOS2019 dataset, with a false alarm rate of 0.00113.

DeepFedKDAD: Deep Federated Knowledge Distillation Based Anomaly Detection in B5G Network Slicing

Mobile Edge Computing-Based Data-Driven Deep Learning Framework for Anomaly Detection

DeepSecure: Detection of Distributed Denial of Service Attacks on 5G Network Slicing—Deep Learning Approach

Accurate Anomaly Detection Leveraging Knowledge-enhanced GAT

Network Anomaly Detection Using Federated Learning

FGAD: Self-boosted Knowledge Distillation for An Effective Federated Graph Anomaly Detection Framework

Federated Learning for 5G and Beyond, a Blessing and a Curse- An Experimental Study on Intrusion Detection Systems

Balancing Data Privacy and 5G VNFs Security Monitoring: Federated Learning with CNN + BiLSTM + LSTM Model

Federated Multi-Discriminator BiWGAN-GP based Collaborative Anomaly Detection for Virtualized Network Slicing

Deep Learning-Based Adaptive Compression and Anomaly Detection for Smart B5G Use Cases Operation

Reconstructed Graph Neural Network With Knowledge Distillation for Lightweight Anomaly Detection

Multi-Channel Knowledge Distillation Via Efficient Feature Fusion Module for Anomaly Segmentation

An Anomaly Detection Algorithm Based on Ensemble Learning for 5G Environment

Deep Learning-Based Big Data-Assisted Anomaly Detection in Cellular Networks

Federated deep learning for anomaly detection in the internet of things

Network Anomaly Detection in 5G Networks

Dual-Branch Knowledge Distillation Via Residual Features Aggregation Module for Anomaly Segmentation

Anomaly Detection in 6G Networks Using Machine Learning Methods

A Fault Diagnosis Method for 5G Cellular Networks Based on Knowledge and Data Fusion

FedAD-Bench: A Unified Benchmark for Federated Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Tabular Data

Machine Learning based Anomaly Detection for 5G Networks