Abstract:Abstract Surface wave (SW) methods extract dispersion properties of wavefields propagating through a seismic array (1D or 2D). This is achieved by analysing the phase velocity versus frequency (or wavelength) data. Afterwards, an inversion process is performed to construct near‐surface S‐wave velocity models. Among the SW methods, multichannel analysis of SWs (MASW) is commonly used for engineering applications, analysing dispersion characteristics by generating a dispersion image. However, classical MASW depends on the manual picking of dispersion curves, which can lead to subjective outcomes and require time and effort to obtain precise results. To avoid these pitfalls, many studies, including deep‐learning techniques, have focused on automating the process. Similarly, we propose a deep‐learning‐based algorithm that estimates the S‐wave velocity directly from the dispersion image of SWs. This algorithm consists of a convolutional neural network (CNN) designed to directly yield S‐wave velocity profiles and a fully connected network (multi‐layer perceptron) added to regularize predictions. Unlike typical SW techniques, the proposed approach does not incorporate prior information such as layer count and thickness. To ensure successful training, we modified the loss function to exploit the normalized mean squared error. The training dataset was generated by modelling synthetic shot gathers and transforming them into dispersion images for various 1D stratified velocity structures. After a sample is fed to the CNN network for inversion, the inversion network's output subsequently goes through an additional simple neural network (NN) to regularize the predicted S‐wave velocity model (which is the post‐processing step). The combined usage of deep‐learning‐based SW inversion with NN‐based post‐processing was assessed using test data. The proposed algorithm achieved an average relative error of approximately 7.49% in predicting the S‐wave velocity and was successfully applied to the field data. Additionally, we discuss its performance on noisy data as well as its applicability to out‐of‐training data. Numerical examples demonstrated that the proposed method is robust to noise, whereas it requires additional training to handle data beyond the distribution of the training data.

Deep Learning-Based Data-Driven P/S-Wave Vector-Decomposition for Multi-Component Seismic Data

Deep Learning-Based Data-Driven P-/S-Wave Vector Decomposition for Multicomponent Seismic Data

Deep Learning-Based P- and S-Wave Separation for Multicomponent Vertical Seismic Profiling.

A Depth-Adaptive Waveform Decomposition Method For Airborne Lidar Bathymetry

Seismic Volumetric Dip Estimation via Multichannel Deep Learning Model

Seismic Data Reconstruction via Wavelet-Based Residual Deep Learning

Accelerating Seismic Dip Estimation with Deep Learning

A New P-wave Reconstruction Method for VSP Data Using Conditional Generative Adversarial Network

Deep-Learning Full-Waveform Inversion Using Seismic Migration Images

Simulating Multicomponent Elastic Seismic Wavefield Using Deep Learning

A Denoising Method for Seismic Data Based on SVD and Deep Learning

Seismic Multi-Channel Deconvolution Via 2D K-SVD and MSD-oCSC

Deep Learning-based extraction of surface wave dispersion curves from seismic shot gathers

Deep-learning seismic full-waveform inversion for realistic structural models

Seismic Wavefield Information Extraction Method Based on Adaptive Local Singular Value Decomposition

Separation of P-and SV-wavefields from multi-component seismic data

Seismic Multichannel Deconvolution via 2-D K-SVD and MSD-oCSC

Prediction of S‐wave velocity models from surface waves using deep learning

Enhanced Discrimination of Seismic Geological Channels Based on Multi-Trace Variational Mode Decomposition

Amplitude-preserving P-/S-wavefield Separation with the Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Unstructured Meshes

Detection of Low-Velocity Layer Using Passive Surface-Wave Data and Deep Learning: An Application in The Urban Area of Hangzhou, China