Abstract:Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become one of the indispensable tools to learn from graph-structured data, and their usefulness has been shown in wide variety of tasks. In recent years, there have been tremendous improvements in architecture design, resulting in better performance on various prediction tasks. In general, these neural architectures combine node feature aggregation and feature transformation using learnable weight matrix in the same layer. This makes it challenging to analyze the importance of node features aggregated from various hops and the expressiveness of the neural network layers. As different graph datasets show varying levels of homophily and heterophily in features and class label distribution, it becomes essential to understand which features are important for the prediction tasks without any prior information. In this work, we decouple the node feature aggregation step and depth of graph neural network, and empirically analyze how different aggregated features play a role in prediction performance. We show that not all features generated via aggregation steps are useful, and often using these less informative features can be detrimental to the performance of the GNN model. Through our experiments, we show that learning certain subsets of these features can lead to better performance on wide variety of datasets. Based on our observations, we introduce several key design strategies for graph neural networks. More specifically, we propose to use softmax as a regularizer and ”soft-selector” of features aggregated from neighbors at different hop distances; and L2-Normalization over GNN layers. Combining these techniques, we present a simple and shallow model, Feature Selection Graph Neural Network (FSGNN), and show empirically that the proposed model achieves comparable or even higher accuracy than state-of-the-art GNN models in nine benchmark datasets for the node classification task, with remarkable improvements up to 51.1%. Source code available at https://github.com/sunilkmaurya/FSGNN/.

All Nodes Are Created Not Equal: Node-Specific Layer Aggregation and Filtration for GNN

NGAT: Attention in Breadth and Depth Exploration for Semi-Supervised Graph Representation Learning

SF-GNN: Self Filter for Message Lossless Propagation in Deep Graph Neural Network

Clarify Confused Nodes via Separated Learning

Node-oriented Spectral Filtering for Graph Neural Networks

The Snowflake Hypothesis: Training and Powering GNN with One Node One Receptive Field

GNN S ,Y OU C AN B E S TRONGER ,DEEPER AND F ASTER

The Snowflake Hypothesis: Training Deep GNN with One Node One Receptive field

Universal Inceptive GNNs by Eliminating the Smoothness-generalization Dilemma

Simplifying approach to node classification in Graph Neural Networks

Deep Graph Neural Networks via Flexible Subgraph Aggregation

Complete the Missing Half: Augmenting Aggregation Filtering with Diversification for Graph Convolutional Neural Networks

Enhancing Graph Neural Networks by a High-quality Aggregation of Beneficial Information

Another Perspective of Over-Smoothing: Alleviating Semantic Over-Smoothing in Deep GNNs

Seeking Similarities While Removing Differences: Graph Neural Networks Based on Node Correlation.

Ada-GNN: Adapting to Local Patterns for Improving Graph Neural Networks

From Stars to Subgraphs: Uplifting Any GNN with Local Structure Awareness

Layer-diverse Negative Sampling for Graph Neural Networks

Deep Graph Neural Networks with Shallow Subgraph Samplers

Learning Graph Neural Networks with Positive and Unlabeled Nodes

Graph Elimination Networks