Development and validation of a novel risk score to predict 5-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction in China: a retrospective study
Yan Tang,Yuanyuan Bai,Yuanyuan Chen,Xuejing Sun,Yunmin Shi,Tian He,Mengqing Jiang,Yujie Wang,Mingxing Wu,Zhiliu Peng,Suzhen Liu,Weihong Jiang,Yao Lu,Hong Yuan,Jingjing Cai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.12652
IF: 3.061
2022-01-04
PeerJ
Abstract:Background The disease burden from ischaemic heart disease remains heavy in the Chinese population. Traditional risk scores for estimating long-term mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been developed without sufficiently considering advances in interventional procedures and medication. The goal of this study was to develop a risk score comprising clinical parameters and intervention advances at hospital admission to assess 5-year mortality in AMI patients in a Chinese population. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study on 2,722 AMI patients between January 2013 and December 2017. Of these patients, 1,471 patients from Changsha city, Hunan Province, China were assigned to the development cohort, and 1,251 patients from Xiangtan city, Hunan Province, China, were assigned to the validation cohort. Forty-five candidate variables assessed at admission were screened using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, stepwise backward regression, and Cox regression methods to construct the C2ABS2-GLPK score, which was graded and stratified using a nomogram and X-tile. The score was internally and externally validated. The C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test were used to assess discrimination and calibration, respectively. Results From the 45 candidate variables obtained at admission, 10 potential predictors, namely, including C reatinine, experience of C ardiac arrest, A ge, N-terminal Pro- B rain Natriuretic Peptide, a history of S troke, S tatins therapy, fasting blood G lucose, L eft ventricular end-diastolic diameter, P ercutaneous coronary intervention and K illip classification were identified as having a close association with 5-year mortality in patients with AMI and collectively termed the C2ABS2-GLPK score. The score had good discrimination (C-statistic = 0.811, 95% confidence intervals (CI) [0.786–0.836]) and calibration (calibration slope = 0.988) in the development cohort. In the external validation cohort, the score performed well in both discrimination (C-statistic = 0.787, 95% CI [0.756–0.818]) and calibration (calibration slope = 0.976). The patients were stratified into low- (≤148), medium- (149 to 218) and high-risk (≥219) categories according to the C2ABS2-GLPK score. The predictive performance of the score was also validated in all subpopulations of both cohorts. Conclusion The C2ABS2-GLPK score is a Chinese population-based risk assessment tool to predict 5-year mortality in AMI patients based on 10 variables that are routinely assessed at admission. This score can assist physicians in stratifying high-risk patients and optimizing emergency medical interventions to improve long-term survival in patients with AMI.
multidisciplinary sciences