Abstract:Abstract: The effects of asymmetric information are often difficult to detect empirically, such as in insurance settings (Chiappori, Jullien, Salanie and Salanie, 2006). We show that allowing for the possibility of referencedependent preferences can assist with this challenge. Using detailed auto insurance claims data and adopting the methodology of Allen, DeChow, Pope and Wu (2017) which studies reference-dependence in marathon finishing times, we show that policyholders exaggerate their damage claims in a manner consistent with referencedependent moral hazard. Consistent with our theoretical model of reference-dependent claims, we find stronger reference-dependent behavior among policyholders with higher premium levels and low risk policyholders. Also consistent with the model, policyholders are more reference-dependent in their first claims than in subsequent claims, and in the second half of the coverage year compared to the first half. The detected reference point is the amount of the original premium paid in other words, in claiming their accident damages, policyholders seek to claim back the original price of their insurance. We do not find robust patterns in the concentration of insurance claims at round number percentages greater than or less than the full premium amount, such as 90% or 110%, nor at round number nominal amounts. This implies that the unnatural claim behavior is motivated significantly by loss aversion regarding the premium paid rather than merely wanting to increase one’s claims more generally. Since damage claims can only be this precisely manipulated by the policy holder after an accident, the findings can be attributed primarily to ex-post moral hazard but not adverse selection or ex-ante moral hazard. Furthermore, the pattern exists only for individually-held policies but not corporate-held policies, which is consistent with a reference point in individual utility. Our study illustrates the potential of behavioral economics frameworks in assisting with identification challenges for classical economic problems.

Relational Contracts in Usage-Based Insurance

Pareto optimal moral-hazard-free insurance contracts in behavioral finance framework

Optimal dynamic insurance contracts

Insurtech, sensor data, and changes in customers' coverage choices: Evidence from usage‐based automobile insurance

Good Drivers Pay Less: A Study of Usage-Based Vehicle Insurance Models

Mitigating Moral Hazard in Cyber Insurance Using Risk Preference Design

Information Asymmetry, Ex Ante Moral Hazard, and Uninsurable Risk in Liability Coverage: Evidence from China's Automobile Insurance Market

Multidimensional Private Information, Market Structure and Insurance Markets

Latent Class Analysis of Accident Risks in Usage-Based Insurance: Evidence from Beijing

Optimal Insurance with Rank-Dependent Utility and Increasing Indemnities

Weighted Utility Optimization of the Participating Endowment Contract

Driving risk prevention in usage-based insurance services based on interpretable machine learning and telematics data

Robust reinsurance contracts in continuous time

Optimal Cyber-Insurance Contract Design for Dynamic Risk Management and Mitigation

Variance Contracts

An insurance theory based optimal cyber-insurance contract against moral hazard

Variance Insurance Contracts

Dynamic Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis and Welfare Implication

Exaggerating to Break-Even: Reference-Dependent Moral Hazard in Auto Insurance Claims

Bounded, Sigmoid Utility for Insurance Applications

Indifference pricing of pure endowments via BSDEs under partial information