Abstract:Low-carbon closed-loop supply chain (LC-CLSC) plays an important role in realizing a low-carbon circular economy. In order to facilitate governments to make emission reduction subsidy and recycling subsidy decisions and LC-CLSC members to formulate pricing, emission reduction investment and recycling investment decisions, this paper proposes multiple three-level differential game models of a LC-CLSC involving the manufacturer, retailer and government considering the dynamic characteristics of product goodwill and recycling rate. Under the four scenarios of three different power structures: manufacturer-led, retailer-led and non-led, and centralized decision-making, some critical equilibrium results are first solved and discussed, including government's optimal emission reduction subsidy and recycling subsidy rates, the manufacturer's wholesale price and emission reduction investment, the retailer's retail price and recycling investment, product goodwill and waste product recycling rate, profits of the manufacturer, retailer and government, etc. To further achieve the LC-CLSC coordination, the contracts under three different power structures are designed, and the conditions that the coordination parameters satisfy are given. Through mathematical derivation of equilibrium results and sensitivity analysis with the help of numerical examples, this paper finds that the government subsidy rates are dependent on the power status between manufacturers and retailers, and the weaker party will get higher subsidy rate. The government subsidy mechanism can significantly reduce the gaps between the manufacturer-led and retailer-led cases, such as manufacturer's emission reduction investment, the retailer's recycling investment, steady-state retail price, and product goodwill and recycling rate. Under the effect of the government subsidy mechanism, the non-led case is more conducive to the recycling of waste products and the improvement of social welfare than the unilateral domination cases. The findings can help manufacturers and retailers in the LC-CLSC formulate optimal strategies like pricing, emission reduction and recycling, and develop coordination contracts to further improve the overall performance of the supply chain according to their different power structures. More importantly, they can also help governments make optimal emission reduction and recycling subsidy decisions according to member companies' different power structures so as to improve subsidy efficiency.

A differential game model for closed-loop supply chain participants under carbon emission permits

Differential Game Model of Shared Manufacturing Supply Chain Considering Low-Carbon Emission Reduction

Differential Game Analysis for Cooperation Models in Automotive Supply Chain under Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Policies

The Sustainable Supply Chain Network Competition Based on Non-Cooperative Equilibrium under Carbon Emission Permits

Emission Reduction of Low-Carbon Supply Chain Based on Uncertain Differential Game

Differential Game Model for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain's Optimal Strategy under the Reference Carbon Emission Effect

Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game

Carbon emission reduction decisions of supply chain members under cap-and-trade regulations: A differential game analysis

Non-Cooperative Game and Cooperative Operation of Multi-Level Supply Chain Under Background of Carbon Emission Reduction

Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences

Differential game analysis of joint emission reduction decisions under mixed carbon policies and CEA

A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors

An eco-friendly closed-loop supply chain facing demand and carbon price uncertainty

Pricing, carbon emission reduction, collection decision, and coordination in a low-carbon closed-loop supply chain

Dynamic analysis of a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with fairness concerns under carbon tax regulation

Pricing, carbon emission reduction and recycling decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under uncertain environment

Stochastic Differential Games of Carbon Emission Reduction in the Four-Tier Supply Chain System Based on Reference Low-Carbon Level

Dynamic decision-making and coordination of low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering different power structures and government double subsidy

A differential game approach to the low-carbon chains considering the role of shareholding

Game theoretic model for low carbon supply chain under carbon emissions reduction sensitive random demand

Coordination Analysis of the Recycling and Remanufacturing Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumers’ Low Carbon Preference and Government Subsidy