Abstract:Hydrological models have been developed in response to the need to understand the complex water cycle of the Earth and to assess its interaction with historical and future climate scenarios. In the global water sector of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project phase 2b (ISIMIP2b), six land surface models (LSMs), eight hydrological models (GHMs), and one dynamic vegetation model (DGVM) are contributing with transient simulations spanning from 1660 to 2300. The model simulations follow a common protocol and are driven by common bias adjusted climate model outputs combined with plausible socio-economic scenarios and representative concentration pathways. The main goal of this study is to highlight similarities and differences among these models in simulating the vertical water balance. The main similarity of these models consists in the water cycle simulation, even if the models have been developed for different purposes such as energy cycle (LSMs), water cycle (GHMs), or vegetation cycle (DGVM) simulation. In particular, we address the following research question: 1) what equations are used to compute water storages and water fluxes; 2) how different are the equations among the models; 3) how the equations were adjusted; 4) how many parameters are used by the models; 5) how often the parameters are used; 6) how similar or different are the parameters among the models. To this end, we apply a standard writing style of the water storages and water fluxes included in the models, to easily identify the similarities and differences among them. Most of the models include in their structure the canopy, soil, and snow storages, and almost half of them include the groundwater storage. Furthermore, we find that: 1) a model needs a very good documentation, this would help to easily identify and understand the equations in the code; 2) some modelers teams use common approaches resulting in similar equations of water storages or water fluxes, but different models structures still lead to different models results; 3) collaboration and communication among the modelers are necessary, on the one hand, for the realization of the models standard writing style, and on the other hand, for a better understanding of the models themselves, especially their strengths, limitations and results. Overall, our results (i) help to better explain the different models results and to attribute these to the differences in simulating specific processes; (ii) contribute to the remarkable efforts in creating a common protocol and a common input datasets for well-defined simulations; (iii) foster a better understanding of how the models work and finding new ways of improvement and development.

Graphical representation of global water models

Understanding Each Other's Models: an Introduction and a Standard Representation of 16 Global Water Models to Support Intercomparison, Improvement, and Communication

Similarities and Differences among Fifteen Global Water Models in Simulating the Vertical Water Balance

Multimodel Estimate of the Global Terrestrial Water Balance: Setup and First Results

The global water resources and use model WaterGAP v2.2d: Model description and evaluation

Development of a visualization tool for integrated surface water–groundwater modeling

Worldwide Evaluation of Mean and Extreme Runoff from Six Global-Scale Hydrological Models That Account for Human Impacts

Human–water Interface in Hydrological Modelling : Current Status and Future Directions

The Critical Role of the Routing Scheme in Simulating Peak River Discharge in Global Hydrological Models

Global hydrological models continue to overestimate river discharge

Global evaluation of runoff simulation from climate, hydrological and land surface models

Development of the Community Water Model (CWatM v1.04) – a high-resolution hydrological model for global and regional assessment of integrated water resources management

Evaluating Global Streamflow Simulations by a Physically Based Routing Model Coupled with the Community Land Model

Modelling water quantity and quality for integrated water cycle management with the Water Systems Integrated Modelling framework (WSIMOD) software

Human domination of the global water cycle absent from depictions and perceptions

Virtual Hydrological Laboratories: Developing the Next Generation of Conceptual Models to Support Decision Making Under Change

Enhancing the representation of water management in global hydrological models

Behind the scenes of runoff performance

Hydrological modelling on atmospheric grids: using graphs of sub-grid elements to transport energy and water

A Framework for Ensemble Modelling of Climate Change Impacts on Lakes Worldwide: the ISIMIP Lake Sector

A global water resources ensemble of hydrological models: the eartH2Observe Tier-1 dataset