Diagnostic Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Stiff Shoulder: Association of Axillary Recess Thickness with Standard Clinical Measures

Buwen Yao,Yanyan Yang,Shawn C Roll,Zhuohua Lin,Yuanmingfei Zhang,Jie Jiang,Mouwang Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000002517
IF: 3.4123
2024-01-01
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Abstract:OBJECTIVES:Stiff shoulder, including primary and secondary types, poses diagnostic challenges due to vague definitions and criteria. This study evaluates the diagnostic potential of ultrasound-measured axillary recess (AR) thickness in shoulder stiffness.DESIGNS:In this cross-sectional study, 35 patients with unilateral shoulder stiffness were assessed. AR thickness was measured using high-resolution ultrasound. Parameters like passive range of motion (PROM), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and Constant-Murley (CM) score were evaluated to find correlations with AR thickness.RESULTS:The average age was 50.7 years, and mean BMI was 22.7. AR thickness in stiff shoulders (average 3.19 mm) was significantly higher than in unaffected shoulders (average 1.93 mm, p < 0.001). A cutoff of 3.0 mm for AR thickness yielded 73.3% sensitivity and 84.6% specificity for primary stiffness; 2.6 mm cutoff resulted in 57.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity for secondary stiffness. Significant correlations were found between AR thickness and PROM, especially in shoulder external rotation and extension.CONCLUSION:AR thickness measured by ultrasound might serve as a valuable diagnostic and evaluation parameter in shoulder stiffness.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?