Comparison of vonoprazan bismuth‐containing triple therapy with quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori‐infected treatment‐naive patients: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial
Jing Wen Liang,Si Xiong,Ye Gui Jia,Dan Xiao,Shi Yun Tan,Ji Wang Cao,Jun Sun,Xia Tian,Shu Yu Li,Rui Hong Chen,Gui Zhen Ruan,Jian Guang Xiong,Xiao Ming Wang,San Ping Xu,Li Ping Qi,Yun Hua Liu,Yu Chong Zhao,Shu Ya Bai,Wei Chen,Meng Die Cao,Wang Peng,Yan Ling Li,Yi Lei Yang,Shi Ru Chen,Hao Chen Cui,Lu Yao Liu,Aruna,Yi Zhou,Bin Cheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16679
2024-07-18
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Abstract:Background and Aim Helicobacter pylori infection is linked to various gastrointestinal conditions, such as chronic active gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer. Traditional treatment options encounter difficulties due to antibiotic resistance and adverse effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the effectiveness of a new treatment plan that combines vonoprazan (VPZ), amoxicillin, and bismuth for the eradication of H. pylori. Methods A total of 600 patients infected with H. pylori were recruited for this multicenter randomized controlled trial. Patients treated for H. pylori elimination were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive 14 days of vonoprazan‐based triple therapy (vonoprazan + amoxicillin + bismuth, group A) or standard quadruple therapy (esomeprazole + clarithromycin + amoxicillin + bismuth, group B). Compliance and adverse effects were tracked through daily medication and side effect records. All patients underwent a 13C/14C‐urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment completion. Results Intention‐to‐treat (ITT) and per‐protocol (PP) analyses revealed no substantial differences in H. pylori eradication rates between groups A and B (ITT: 83.7% vs 83.2%; PP: 90.9% vs 89.7%). However, significant differences were observed in the assessment of side effects (13.7% vs 28.6%, P
gastroenterology & hepatology