Association of peripheral inflammatory indicators with osteoarthritis risk
Shiyong Zhang,Yanlin Zhong,Xudong Wang,Wei Jiang,Xicong Chen,Yunze Kang,Zhiwen Li,Weiming Liao,Linli Zheng,Puyi Sheng,Ziji Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100496
2024-06-19
Abstract:Objectives: Numerous studies have established the role of inflammation in osteoarthritis (OA) progression, yet limited research explores the association between systemic inflammatory indicators and pre-diagnosis OA risk. This study aimed to investigate the association between peripheral inflammatory indicators and the risk of OA using data from the UK Biobank. Methods: The study analyzed data from 417,507 participants in the UK Biobank, including neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, platelet count, and C-reactive protein meter. Additionally, derived ratios such as NLR(neutrophils-lymphocytes ratio), PLR(Platelets-lymphocytes ratio), SII(systemic immune-inflammation index), and LMR (lymphocytes-monocytes ratio) were examined. Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic spline models were used to assess both linear and nonlinear associations. Results: Over a mean follow-up period of 12.7 years, a total of 49,509 OA events were identified. The findings revealed that CRP (HR:1.06, 95%CI:1.05-1.07), NLR (HR:1.02, 95%CI:1.01-1.03), PLR (HR:1.02, 95%CI:1.01-1.03), and SII (HR:1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.04) were associated with an increased risk of OA, while LMR (HR:0.97, 95%CI:0.96-0.99) showed a significant negative correlation with OA risk. Subgroup analyses further emphasized that these associations were significant across most of the population. Although neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets showed a nominal association with the risk of OA, the results were unreliable, especially for specific joint OA. Conclusion: The study provides evidence of a significant association between elevated peripheral inflammatory indicators and OA risk. These findings underscore the importance of low-grade chronic inflammation in OA development. The potential clinical utility of these indicators as early predictors of OA is suggested, warranting further exploration.