Abstract:Growing access to different sources of airborne LiDAR, including data acquired from airplanes, helicopters and unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs), is transforming our ability to capture the 3D structure of forests at scale. However, considerable uncertainty remains as to how comparable structural metrics derived from these various platforms are to each other. Using LiDAR data acquired concurrently from airplanes and UAVs across 115 sites in an open‐canopy woodland ecosystem in Australia, we tested the robustness of 32 commonly used canopy structural metrics. We show that many widely used canopy structural metrics show poor agreement between these two platforms, but were also able to identify a subset of metrics that provide a robust and ecologically intuitive way of characterizing the structure of open‐canopy forests worldwide. LiDAR data acquired from airplanes and helicopters – known as airborne laser scanning (ALS) – are widely regarded as the gold standard for characterizing the 3D structure of forests at scale. But in the last decade, advances in unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV) technologies have led to a rapid rise in the use of UAV laser scanning (ULS) for mapping forest structure. As both ALS and ULS data become increasingly available, they are being used to derive an ever‐growing number of metrics designed to measure different facets of canopy structure. However, which metrics can be robustly retrieved from both ALS and ULS platforms remains unclear. To address this question, we acquired coincident, high‐density ALS and ULS scans covering 115 plots (4‐ha in size) in an open‐canopy temperate ecosystem in Western Australia. Using this unique dataset, we quantified 32 canopy structural metrics related to canopy height, openness and heterogeneity, including metrics calculated directly from the point clouds and ones measured from derived canopy height models (CHM). Overall, we found that ALS and ULS‐derived metrics were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.90). However, this high degree of correlation masked considerable systematic differences between platforms. Specifically, point cloud metrics were less strongly (r2 = 0.87) correlated and had higher bias (10.7%) compared to CHM‐derived ones (r2 = 0.98; bias = 2.5%). Similarly, metrics of canopy openness and heterogeneity were less strongly correlated (r2 = 0.84 and 0.87) and exhibited greater bias (14.4 and 7.9%) than ones relating to canopy height (r2 = 0.96; bias = 3.8%). Our results indicate that only a small subset of the 32 metrics we tested were directly comparable between ALS and ULS platforms. Consequently, future efforts to combine laser scanning data across platforms and instruments should think carefully about which metrics are most appropriate, especially when working with point cloud data.

Incorporating of Spatial Effects in Forest Canopy Height Mapping Using Airborne, Spaceborne Lidar and Spatial Continuous Remote Sensing Data

A comparative analysis of modeling approaches and canopy height-based data sources for mapping forest growing stock volume in a northern subtropical ecosystem of China

A Novel Workflow for Mapping Forest Canopy Height by Synergizing ICESat-2 and Multi-Sensor Data

Estimation of canopy height based on multi-source remote sensing data using forest structure aided sample selection

Improving Measurement of Forest Structural Parameters by Co-Registering of High Resolution Aerial Imagery and Low Density LiDAR Data

Estimation of Forest Canopy Height by Integrating Multisensor Data

Estimating Forest Canopy Height based on GEDI Lidar Data and Multi-source Remote Sensing Images

Canopy Height Layering Biomass Estimation Model (CHL-BEM) with Full-Waveform LiDAR

Examining the Impact of Topography and Vegetation on Existing Forest Canopy Height Products from ICESat-2 ATLAS/GEDI Data

Constructing a Finer-Resolution Forest Height in China Using ICESat/GLAS, Landsat and ALOS PALSAR Data and Height Patterns of Natural Forests and Plantations

Enhancing high-resolution forest stand mean height mapping in China through an individual tree-based approach with close-range lidar data

A Framework for Improving Wall-to-Wall Canopy Height Mapping by Integrating GEDI LiDAR

Characterizing the Spatial Variations of Forest Sunlit and Shaded Components Using Discrete Aerial Lidar

Genetic Programming Guided Mapping of Forest Canopy Height by Combining LiDAR Satellites with Sentinel-1/2, Terrain, and Climate Data

Forest Canopy Height Mapping by Synergizing ICESat-2, Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Topographic Information Based on Machine Learning Methods

Continuous mapping of forest canopy height using ICESat-2 data and a weighted kernel integration of multi-temporal multi-source remote sensing data aided by Google Earth Engine

Analysis of the Spatial Differences in Canopy Height Models from UAV LiDAR and Photogrammetry

Integrating LiDAR, Multispectral and SAR Data to Estimate and Map Canopy Height in Tropical Forests

Spatially Continuous Estimation of Urban Forest Aboveground Biomass with UAV-LiDAR and Multispectral Scanning: an Allometric Model of Forest Structural Diversity

High-resolution mapping of forest canopy height using machine learning by coupling ICESat-2 LiDAR with Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data

Robust retrieval of forest canopy structural attributes using multi‐platform airborne LiDAR