Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to address whether gender diversity on compensation committees ensures objective determination of CEOs’ compensation.Design/methodology/approachThe authors use a sample of companies listed in China from 2006 to 2015. The authors use pooled ordinary least square regression as the baseline methodology, and two-stage least square regression and propensity score matching to control for endogeneity.FindingsThe authors find evidence that gender-diverse compensation committees limit CEOs’ total cash compensation and strengthen the link between CEO pay and firm performance, but only independent female directors have a significant impact, indicating that the monitoring effect outweighs the executive effect. Moreover, compensation committees with a critical mass of female directors have more impact on CEOs’ total pay and the link between CEO pay and firm performance than do committees with a single female director. Finally, gender-diverse compensation committees are more effective in setting CEOs’ compensation in state-controlled firms, where agency issues are more severe.Practical implicationsFemale directors can improve firm-level governance by monitoring management actions, such as setting CEOs’ compensation. The study contributes to the debate on gender diversity in the boardroom, finding a positive economic effect. The study sheds light on China’s diversity practices at the director level and provides empirical guidance to China’s regulatory bodies.Originality/valueThe authors extend earlier studies by providing the first empirical evidence that gender-diverse compensation committees strengthen the link between CEO pay and firm performance; that independent female directors are more effective in the monitoring role than executive female directors; that compensation committees with a critical mass of female directors are more effective in setting CEOs’ pay than are committees with a single female director; and that the influence of gender-diverse compensation committees on CEOs’ pay varies by type of ownership.

Board Gender Diversity and Within-Firm Wage Inequity: Evidence from the Relaxation of China’s One-Child Policy

Board Gender Diversity and Cost of Equity: Evidence from Mandatory Female Board Representation

The Wage Gap Between State And Private Enterprises In China: Counterfactual Analysis Based On Quantile Regression

Are female directors more employee-friendly? Board gender diversity and employee benefits: evidence from China

Gender Diversity in Compensation Committees and CEO Pay: Evidence from China

Gender Diversity in the Boardroom on Private Equity Placements: Evidence from China

Board Gender Diversity and Dividend Policy in Chinese Listed Firms

Female CEOs and Top Management Team Composition: A Quasi-Experiment of the One-Child Policy in China

Does Confucianism Reduce Board Gender Diversity? Firm-Level Evidence from China

Can female executives improve employment relations outcomes? Empirical evidence from China with gender implications

Diversity in boardroom and debt financing: A case from China

Gender Diversity and Environmental Performance: New Evidence from China

Labor market segmentation and the gender wage gap: Evidence from China

Female Board Leadership, Firm Performance, and Corporate Governance: Evidence from China

Do women in the boardroom influence foreign acquisitions' premium and outcomes? Evidence from China

Female Directors and Corporation Diversification: Evidences from China

Labor Market Behavior of Chinese Rural Households During Transition

Gender Attitudes and the Effect of Board Gender Diversity on Corporate Environmental Responsibility

The Gender Pay Gap in China: Insights from a Discrimination Perspective

Impact of two-child policy on female employment and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2020

Female CEOs and earnings management: examining risk aversion versus social identity theories