Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography – high-resolution mass spectrometry for complex protein digest analysis using parallel gradients

Andrea Gargano,Rick S. van den Hurk ,Bart Lagerwaard ,Nathan Terlouw,Mingzhe Sun,Anniek Verstegen,Job Tieleman,Saer Samanipour,Bob W.J. Pirok
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-n62vd-v2
2024-04-26
Abstract:Despite the high gain in peak capacity, online comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC×LC-HRMS) has not yet been widely applied to the analysis of complex protein digests. One reason is the methods' reduced sensitivity that can be linked to the high flow rates of the second separation dimension (2D ). This results in higher dilution factors and the need for flow splitters to couple to ESI-MS. This study reports proof of principle results of the development of an RPLC×RPLC-HRMS using parallel-gradients (2D flow rate of 0.7 mL min-1) and its comparison to shifted gradient methods (2D of 1.4 mL min-1) for the analysis of complex digests using a QExactive-Plus MS. Shifted and parallel-gradients resulted in high surface coverage (SC) and effective peak capacity (SC of 0.6226 and 0.7439 and an effective peak capacity of 779 and 757 in 60 minutes). When applied to a cell line digest sample, parallel-gradients allowed higher sensitivity (e.g., average MS intensity increased by a factor of 3), allowing for a higher number of identifications (e.g., about 2600 vs 3900 peptides). In addition, reducing the modulation time to 10s significantly increased the number of MS/MS events that could be performed. When compared to a 1D-RPLC method, parallel RPLC×RPLC-HRMS methods offered higher separation performance (FHWH from 0.12 to 0.018 min) with limited sensitivity losses resulting in an increase of analyte identifications (e.g. about 6000 vs 7000 peptides).
Chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper mainly discusses the optimization of the two-dimensional liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC×LC-HRMS) method for analyzing complex protein hydrolysates. In the study, the use of parallel gradient (2D flow rate of 0.7 mL/min) reversed-phase liquid chromatography × reversed-phase liquid chromatography-HRMS (RPLC×RPLC-HRMS) is proposed and compared with the shifted gradient method (2D flow rate of 1.4 mL/min). Traditional methods suffer from reduced sensitivity due to the high flow rate in the second dimension, requiring the use of a flow splitter connected to the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS), which affects the analytical performance. By using the parallel gradient method, researchers found that sensitivity can be improved (e.g., average MS intensity increased three times), the number of identified peptide segments can be increased, and the modulation time can be significantly shortened, resulting in increased achievable MS/MS events. Compared to the 1D-RPLC method, parallel RPLC×RPLC-HRMS provides higher separation performance (peak width reduced from 0.12 minutes to 0.018 minutes), although there is a slight loss in sensitivity, the number of identified analytes increases. The paper also discusses the advantages of parallel gradient over shifted gradient, including reducing pressure on the 2D column, improving reproducibility and more stable retention time. In addition, the parallel gradient method does not require a high flow rate in the second dimension, therefore, there is no need for post-column flow splitting, avoiding band broadening and sensitivity loss. In summary, the goal of the paper is to address the sensitivity and separation efficiency issues of online comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography-LC×LC-HRMS in analyzing complex protein hydrolysates, by developing and comparing different gradient strategies to optimize method performance.