Abstract:As a new programming paradigm, deep learning (DL) has achieved impressive performance in areas such as image processing and speech recognition, and has expanded its application to solve many real-world problems. However, neural networks and DL are normally black-box systems; even worse, DL-based software are vulnerable to threats from abnormal examples, such as adversarial and backdoored examples constructed by attackers with malicious intentions as well as unintentionally mislabeled samples. Therefore, it is important and urgent to detect such abnormal examples. Although various detection approaches have been proposed respectively addressing some specific types of abnormal examples, they suffer from some limitations; until today, this problem is still of considerable interest. In this work, we first propose a novel characterization to distinguish abnormal examples from normal ones based on the observation that abnormal examples have significantly different (adversarial) robustness from normal ones. We systemically analyze those three different types of abnormal samples in terms of robustness and find that they have different characteristics from normal ones. As robustness measurement is computationally expensive and hence can be challenging to scale to large networks, we then propose to effectively and efficiently measure robustness of an input sample using the cost of adversarially attacking the input, which was originally proposed to test robustness of neural networks against adversarial examples. Next, we propose a novel detection method, named attack as detection (A 2 D for short), which uses the cost of adversarially attacking an input instead of robustness to check if it is abnormal. Our detection method is generic, and various adversarial attack methods could be leveraged. Extensive experiments show that A 2 D is more effective than recent promising approaches that were proposed to detect only one specific type of abnormal examples. We also thoroughly discuss possible adaptive attack methods to our adversarial example detection method and show that A 2 D is still effective in defending carefully designed adaptive adversarial attack methods—for example, the attack success rate drops to 0% on CIFAR10.

AED-PADA: Improving Generalizability of Adversarial Example Detection Via Principal Adversarial Domain Adaptation.

AED-PADA:Improving Generalizability of Adversarial Example Detection via Principal Adversarial Domain Adaptation

Federated Domain Adaptation via Pseudo-label Refinement

Attack As Detection: Using Adversarial Attack Methods to Detect Abnormal Examples.

Class-aware domain adaptation for improving adversarial robustness

Unsupervised Adversarial Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Face Presentation Attack Detection

A Universal Defense Strategy Against Adversarial Attacks Based on Attention-Guided

Attention-based Adversarial Partial Domain Adaptation

Divergence-agnostic Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Adversarial Attacks

Improving the Generalization of Adversarial Training with Domain Adaptation

Adversarial Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Via Real Data Augmentation and Uncertainty Penalization

Improving Cross-database Face Presentation Attack Detection via Adversarial Domain Adaptation

Partial Adversarial Domain Adaptation

Self-Adaptive Partial Domain Adaptation

Alleviating the generalization issue in adversarial domain adaptation networks.

PAD: Patch-Agnostic Defense against Adversarial Patch Attacks

Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixup

Domain-Augmented Domain Adaptation

Multicomponent Adversarial Domain Adaptation: A General Framework.

Adversarial Reweighting with -Power Maximization for Domain Adaptation